ACU vs. JLL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL).

Performance

ACU vs. JLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACU vs. JLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACU Acme United Corporation	12.26%	9.67%	-11.61%	100.21%	-33.82%	13.48%	29.39%	71.41%	-37.83%	-6.95%
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	-9.56%	32.92%	34.03%	18.51%	-40.83%	81.53%	-14.77%	38.32%	-14.54%	48.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACU : $183.05M JLL : $14.66B
EPS ACU : $0.00 JLL : $16.41
PE Ratio ACU : 18.10K JLL : 18.55
PEG Ratio ACU : 204.15 JLL : 0.78
PS Ratio ACU : 937.92 JLL : 0.56
PB Ratio ACU : 1.56K JLL : 1.95
Total Revenue (TTM) ACU : $196.54K JLL : $26.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACU : $77.41K JLL : $14.19B
EBITDA (TTM) ACU : $16.70M JLL : $1.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than JLL's -9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has outperformed JLL with an annualized return of 12.64%, while JLL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.

ACU

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: 27.01%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

JLL

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -9.56%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: 27.89%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACU vs. JLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU

ACU Risk / Return Rank: 56
ACU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ACU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ACU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ACU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ACU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

JLL

JLL Risk / Return Rank: 63
JLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JLL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JLL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACU vs. JLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACU	JLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.65	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.06	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	1.09	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	2.90	-1.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACU vs. JLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACU Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the JLL Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU and JLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACU	JLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	0.65	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	0.30	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.28	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.21	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ACU and JLL is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ACU vs. JLL - Dividend Comparison

ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACU Acme United Corporation	1.43%	1.54%	1.61%	1.31%	2.47%	1.54%	1.59%	2.02%	3.09%	1.79%	1.56%	2.07%
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.65%	0.48%	0.63%	0.35%

Drawdowns

ACU vs. JLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, which is greater than JLL's maximum drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and JLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACU	JLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.05%	-85.92%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.05%	-21.89%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.47%	-55.54%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.47%	-55.54%	+3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-15.15%	+8.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.07%	-31.04%	-8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.63%	8.20%	+0.43%

Volatility

ACU vs. JLL - Volatility Comparison

Acme United Corporation (ACU) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) at 7.61%. This indicates that ACU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACU	JLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.77%	7.61%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.16%	26.90%	-7.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.20%	35.29%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.30%	34.72%	+6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.46%	36.34%	+6.12%

Financials

ACU vs. JLL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acme United Corporation and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of -59.18M and revenue of -148.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

JLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.83B and revenue of 7.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of -11.81M and revenue of -148.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

JLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 506.90M and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of -8.30M and revenue of -148.82M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

JLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 401.70M and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.