PortfoliosLab logo
ACU vs. JLL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACU and JLL is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ACU vs. JLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACU:

-0.20

JLL:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

ACU:

-0.16

JLL:

1.09

Omega Ratio

ACU:

0.98

JLL:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

ACU:

-0.31

JLL:

0.68

Martin Ratio

ACU:

-0.81

JLL:

2.25

Ulcer Index

ACU:

12.57%

JLL:

9.18%

Daily Std Dev

ACU:

37.52%

JLL:

34.64%

Max Drawdown

ACU:

-90.63%

JLL:

-85.93%

Current Drawdown

ACU:

-22.88%

JLL:

-19.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACU:

$141.69M

JLL:

$11.06B

EPS

ACU:

$2.47

JLL:

$11.29

PE Ratio

ACU:

15.28

JLL:

20.62

PEG Ratio

ACU:

1.43

JLL:

0.73

PS Ratio

ACU:

0.72

JLL:

0.47

PB Ratio

ACU:

1.33

JLL:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACU:

$195.49M

JLL:

$24.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACU:

$76.87M

JLL:

$12.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACU:

$18.71M

JLL:

$970.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than JLL's -9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has outperformed JLL with an annualized return of 9.87%, while JLL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.90% annualized return.


ACU

YTD

2.25%

1M

-5.32%

6M

-8.05%

1Y

-7.45%

5Y*

13.91%

10Y*

9.87%

JLL

YTD

-9.29%

1M

2.75%

6M

-14.65%

1Y

18.43%

5Y*

17.17%

10Y*

3.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACU vs. JLL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACU is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACU is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACU is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACU is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACU is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACU is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACU vs. JLL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACU Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the JLL Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU and JLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ACU vs. JLL - Dividend Comparison

ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.58%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%1.65%
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%

Drawdowns

ACU vs. JLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -90.63%, which is greater than JLL's maximum drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and JLL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ACU vs. JLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

ACU vs. JLL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
45.96M
5.75B
(ACU) Total Revenue
(JLL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items