PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACU vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACU vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than ARLP's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has underperformed ARLP with an annualized return of 11.55%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.87% annualized return.


ACU

1D
-0.68%
1M
6.90%
YTD
12.66%
6M
9.27%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
11.55%

ARLP

1D
3.78%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.74%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
41.38%
10Y*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACU vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACU
Acme United Corporation
12.66%9.67%-11.61%100.21%-33.82%13.48%29.39%71.41%-37.83%-6.95%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.30%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-28.90%-1.90%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ACU and ARLP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1999

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACU:

$187.31M

ARLP:

$3.14B

EPS

ACU:

$2.07

ARLP:

$72.64

PE Ratio

ACU:

21.75

ARLP:

0.34

PEG Ratio

ACU:

0.25

ARLP:

0.01

PS Ratio

ACU:

1.23

ARLP:

0.01

PB Ratio

ACU:

1.60K

ARLP:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACU:

$150.64M

ARLP:

$517.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACU:

$59.51M

ARLP:

$353.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACU:

$17.53M

ARLP:

$82.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACU vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU
ACU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACU Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ACU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACU vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACUARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.04

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.19

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

0.35

+1.65

ACU vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACU Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACU vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACUARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.05%

-90.52%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.05%

-17.63%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.71%

-20.83%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.48%

-29.13%

-22.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.47%

-85.26%

+32.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-13.77%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-24.31%

-14.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.53%

9.65%

-1.12%

Volatility

ACU vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) have volatilities of 7.11% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACUARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

7.09%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

16.50%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.96%

23.38%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.38%

33.45%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.39%

50.20%

-7.81%

Dividends

ACU vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than ARLP's 9.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.42%1.54%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.83%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%

Financials

ACU vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20222023202420252026
52.30K
516.02B
(ACU) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACU vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acme United Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
39.7%
0
Portfolio components
ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.79K and revenue of 52.30K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 1.75K and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 985.00 and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACU and ARLP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACU has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to ARLP (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACU dropped -91.05% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

ACU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACU and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer