ACU vs. NVDA
ACU (Acme United Corporation) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. ACU operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ACU returned 11.55%/yr vs 68.65%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ACU vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 11.55%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.65% annualized return.
ACU
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
NVDA
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 45.24%
- 3Y*
- 70.46%
- 5Y*
- 61.50%
- 10Y*
- 68.65%
ACU vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 12.66% | 9.67% | -11.61% | 100.21% | -33.82% | 13.48% | 29.39% | 71.41% | -37.83% | -6.95% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 12.01% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU and NVDA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.07 |
The correlation between ACU and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACU:
$187.31M
NVDA:
$5.09T
ACU:
$2.07
NVDA:
$6.53
ACU:
21.75
NVDA:
31.97
ACU:
0.25
NVDA:
0.18
ACU:
1.23
NVDA:
20.13
ACU:
1.60K
NVDA:
26.04
ACU:
$150.64M
NVDA:
$253.49B
ACU:
$59.51M
NVDA:
$187.95B
ACU:
$17.53M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
ACU
NVDA
ACU vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 2.25 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 5.27 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACU vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.05% | -89.72% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.05% | -20.21% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.71% | -36.88% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.48% | -66.34% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.47% | -66.34% | +13.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -11.39% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.91% | -36.16% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 8.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility
ACU vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Acme United Corporation (ACU) is 7.11%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that ACU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 12.78% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 26.61% | -7.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.96% | 35.31% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.38% | 51.80% | -11.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.39% | 49.89% | -7.50% |
Dividends
ACU vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.61% | 1.31% | 2.47% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.02% | 3.09% | 1.79% | 1.56% | 2.07% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.13% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
ACU vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACU vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
ACU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.79K and revenue of 52.30K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
ACU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 1.75K and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
ACU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 985.00 and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU and NVDA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to ACU (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACU dropped -91.05% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACU and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer