PortfoliosLab logo
ACU vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACU and NVDA is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ACU vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acme United Corporation (ACU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACU:

0.38

NVDA:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

ACU:

0.85

NVDA:

0.86

Omega Ratio

ACU:

1.10

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ACU:

0.42

NVDA:

0.53

Martin Ratio

ACU:

1.23

NVDA:

1.30

Ulcer Index

ACU:

11.17%

NVDA:

15.10%

Daily Std Dev

ACU:

36.61%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

ACU:

-90.63%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

ACU:

-18.99%

NVDA:

-8.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACU:

$150.79M

NVDA:

$3.35T

EPS

ACU:

$2.47

NVDA:

$3.10

PE Ratio

ACU:

16.11

NVDA:

44.32

PEG Ratio

ACU:

1.43

NVDA:

1.67

PS Ratio

ACU:

0.77

NVDA:

22.56

PB Ratio

ACU:

1.39

NVDA:

39.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACU:

$195.49M

NVDA:

$148.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACU:

$76.87M

NVDA:

$104.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACU:

$18.71M

NVDA:

$90.97B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 10.09%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.04% annualized return.


ACU

YTD

7.41%

1M

3.76%

6M

-9.25%

1Y

13.88%

3Y*

8.05%

5Y*

15.06%

10Y*

10.09%

NVDA

YTD

2.31%

1M

19.98%

6M

-0.89%

1Y

25.34%

3Y*

94.43%

5Y*

73.50%

10Y*

74.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Acme United Corporation

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACU vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACU is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACU is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACU is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACU is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACU is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACU is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACU vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACU Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ACU vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.51%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%1.65%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

ACU vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -90.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ACU vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acme United Corporation (ACU) is 6.28%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that ACU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ACU vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
45.96M
44.06B
(ACU) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACU vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acme United Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
39.0%
60.5%
(ACU) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 17.92M and revenue of 45.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.67B and revenue of 44.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 2.43M and revenue of 45.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 21.64B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 1.65M and revenue of 45.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 18.78B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.