ACU vs. AGO
ACU (Acme United Corporation) and AGO (Assured Guaranty Ltd.) are both stocks. ACU operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while AGO operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ACU returned 12.56%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for AGO. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACU vs. AGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 44.63% return, which is significantly higher than AGO's -5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has underperformed AGO with an annualized return of 12.56%, while AGO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.
ACU
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- 6M
- 33.65%
- YTD
- 44.63%
- 1Y
- 45.86%
- 3Y*
- 24.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.36%
AGO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -5.71%
- 1Y
- 1.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.07M | $1.21M | $1.02M | |
| $27.60M | $26.49M | $32.23M |
ACU vs. AGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 44.63% | 9.67% | -11.61% | 100.21% | -33.82% | 13.48% | 29.39% | 71.41% | -37.83% | -6.95% |
AGO Assured Guaranty Ltd. | -5.71% | 1.44% | 22.08% | 22.52% | 26.20% | 62.33% | -33.94% | 30.12% | 14.95% | -9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACU and AGO is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2004 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, ACU and AGO have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ACU:
$219.74M
AGO:
$3.72B
ACU:
$2.37
AGO:
$12.60
ACU:
24.29
AGO:
6.66
ACU:
0.27
AGO:
0.06
ACU:
1.13
AGO:
2.91
ACU:
$211.60M
AGO:
$951.00M
ACU:
$84.82M
AGO:
$663.00M
ACU:
$21.43M
AGO:
$500.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACU vs. AGO — Risk / Return Rank
ACU
AGO
ACU vs. AGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACU | AGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.10 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 0.22 | +5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACU vs. AGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, roughly equal to the maximum AGO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and AGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACU | AGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.05% | -90.18% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.05% | -19.84% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.71% | -21.83% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.89% | -30.23% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.47% | -61.48% | +9.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -9.82% | +6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.81% | -19.78% | -19.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 8.72% | -0.30% |
Volatility
ACU vs. AGO - Volatility Comparison
Acme United Corporation (ACU) has a higher volatility of 16.99% compared to Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) at 4.95%. This indicates that ACU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACU | AGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.99% | 4.95% | +12.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.98% | 17.35% | +7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 22.15% | +12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.04% | 27.05% | +13.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.58% | 33.93% | +8.65% |
Dividends
ACU vs. AGO - Dividend Comparison
ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than AGO's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 1.11% | 1.54% | 1.61% | 1.31% | 2.47% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.02% | 3.09% | 1.79% | 1.56% | 2.07% |
AGO Assured Guaranty Ltd. | 1.72% | 1.51% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.61% | 1.75% | 2.54% | 1.47% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 1.38% | 1.82% |
Financials
ACU vs. AGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and Assured Guaranty Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACU vs. AGO - Profitability Comparison
ACU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.69M and revenue of 62.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
AGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 261.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ACU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 6.83M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
AGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 261.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ACU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 5.05M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
AGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a net income of 88.00M and revenue of 261.00M, resulting in a net margin of 33.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACU and AGO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACU has higher volatility (16.99%) compared to AGO (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACU dropped -91.05% vs AGO's -90.18%.
ACU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACU and AGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer