CERS vs. DHR
CERS (Cerus Corporation) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — CERS in Biotechnology, DHR in Diagnostics & Research. Over the past 10 years, CERS returned -7.04%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for DHR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CERS vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CERS achieves a 29.13% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -22.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CERS has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of -7.04%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.
CERS
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- 29.13%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 84.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- -13.04%
- 10Y*
- -7.04%
DHR
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- -22.04%
- 6M
- -21.78%
- 1Y
- -6.64%
- 3Y*
- -4.53%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
CERS vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 29.13% | 33.77% | -28.70% | -40.82% | -46.40% | -1.59% | 63.98% | -16.77% | 50.00% | -22.30% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -22.04% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CERS and DHR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 1997 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CERS and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CERS:
$516.42M
DHR:
$126.65B
CERS:
-$0.05
DHR:
$5.17
CERS:
2.36
DHR:
5.13
CERS:
7.56
DHR:
2.39
CERS:
$216.56M
DHR:
$24.78B
CERS:
$114.76M
DHR:
$15.04B
CERS:
-$2.69M
DHR:
$6.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CERS vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
CERS
DHR
CERS vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerus Corporation (CERS) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CERS | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.98 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.20 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | -0.50 | +5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CERS | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | -0.24 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | -0.12 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.43 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.64 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
CERS vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CERS drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERS and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CERS | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -45.80% | -53.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.32% | -32.97% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.21% | -41.72% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.37% | -43.81% | -41.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.45% | -43.81% | -42.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.70% | -38.20% | -58.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.39% | -10.21% | -71.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 13.26% | +3.12% |
Volatility
CERS vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to Danaher Corporation (DHR) at 7.84%. This indicates that CERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CERS | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.09% | 7.84% | +11.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.18% | 18.84% | +38.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.72% | 27.70% | +49.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.68% | 27.92% | +41.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.19% | 25.48% | +37.71% |
Dividends
CERS vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
CERS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.76% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
Financials
CERS vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerus Corporation and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CERS vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
CERS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.89M and revenue of 53.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.
CERS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -354.00K and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.7%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.
CERS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -1.64M and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CERS and DHR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CERS has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to DHR (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERS dropped -99.28% vs DHR's -45.80%.
CERS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CERS and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer