PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERS vs. BB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CERS vs. BB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cerus Corporation (CERS) and BlackBerry Limited (BB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERS achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than BB's 124.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CERS has underperformed BB with an annualized return of -11.37%, while BB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.98% annualized return.


CERS

1D
-25.61%
1M
-31.96%
6M
-7.73%
YTD
4.37%
1Y
69.29%
3Y*
-10.21%
5Y*
-15.67%
10Y*
-11.37%
ALL TIME*
-5.73%

BB

1D
0.71%
1M
-26.15%
6M
138.10%
YTD
124.27%
1Y
135.46%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
-3.50%
10Y*
0.98%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$142.34M$219.51M$306.93M
$7.50M$7.32M$7.35M

CERS vs. BB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CERS
Cerus Corporation
4.37%33.77%-28.70%-40.82%-46.40%-1.59%63.98%-16.77%50.00%-22.30%
BB
BlackBerry Limited
124.27%0.26%6.78%8.59%-65.13%41.03%3.27%-9.70%-36.35%62.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CERS and BB is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1999

0.25

The correlation between CERS and BB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CERS:

$430.79M

BB:

$4.98B

EPS

CERS:

-$0.03

BB:

$0.10

PS Ratio

CERS:

1.83

BB:

8.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

CERS:

$227.78M

BB:

$581.41M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CERS:

$121.55M

BB:

$446.55M

EBITDA (TTM)

CERS:

$2.48M

BB:

$80.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CERS vs. BB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CERS
CERS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BB
BB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CERS vs. BB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerus Corporation (CERS) and BlackBerry Limited (BB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CERSBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.36

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

6.93

-2.43

CERS vs. BB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERS Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the BB Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERS and BB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CERS vs. BB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERS drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, roughly equal to the maximum BB drawdown of -98.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERS and BB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CERSBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.28%

-98.57%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.32%

-39.03%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.46%

-62.32%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.37%

-82.01%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.45%

-91.59%

+5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.33%

-94.24%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.46%

-72.19%

-9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.15%

18.89%

-3.74%

Volatility

CERS vs. BB - Volatility Comparison

Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a higher volatility of 32.20% compared to BlackBerry Limited (BB) at 21.28%. This indicates that CERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CERSBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.20%

21.28%

+10.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.83%

50.27%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.08%

59.77%

+19.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.84%

58.43%

+12.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.78%

60.57%

+3.21%

Dividends

CERS vs. BB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CERS nor BB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CERS vs. BB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerus Corporation and BlackBerry Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CERS vs. BB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cerus Corporation and BlackBerry Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CERS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.53M and revenue of 57.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

BB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported a gross profit of 119.70M and revenue of 152.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

CERS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -1.86M and revenue of 57.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.2%.

BB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported an operating income of 15.30M and revenue of 152.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

CERS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -2.94M and revenue of 57.44M, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.

BB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BlackBerry Limited reported a net income of 8.50M and revenue of 152.90M, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CERS and BB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CERS has higher volatility (32.20%) compared to BB (21.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERS dropped -99.28% vs BB's -98.57%.

BB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CERS and BB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer