CERS vs. FTI
CERS (Cerus Corporation) and FTI (TechnipFMC plc) are both stocks. CERS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CERS returned -8.07%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for FTI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CERS vs. FTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CERS achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly lower than FTI's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CERS has underperformed FTI with an annualized return of -8.07%, while FTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.
CERS
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- 1Y
- 94.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- -14.53%
- 10Y*
- -8.07%
FTI
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 50.11%
- 1Y
- 92.50%
- 3Y*
- 66.98%
- 5Y*
- 49.43%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
CERS vs. FTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 26.21% | 33.77% | -28.70% | -40.82% | -46.40% | -1.59% | 63.98% | -16.77% | 50.00% | -22.30% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 51.46% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CERS and FTI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001 | 0.19 |
The correlation between CERS and FTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CERS:
$504.77M
FTI:
$27.62B
CERS:
-$0.05
FTI:
$2.59
CERS:
2.30
FTI:
2.76
CERS:
7.39
FTI:
8.21
CERS:
$216.56M
FTI:
$10.19B
CERS:
$114.76M
FTI:
$2.75B
CERS:
-$2.69M
FTI:
$1.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CERS vs. FTI — Risk / Return Rank
CERS
FTI
CERS vs. FTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerus Corporation (CERS) and TechnipFMC plc (FTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CERS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 6.08 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 18.15 | -12.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CERS vs. FTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CERS drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than FTI's maximum drawdown of -91.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERS and FTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CERS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -91.74% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.32% | -15.29% | -23.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.21% | -28.94% | -33.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.37% | -41.32% | -44.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.45% | -85.71% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.77% | -12.41% | -84.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.40% | -33.90% | -47.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.53% | 5.13% | +11.40% |
Volatility
CERS vs. FTI - Volatility Comparison
Cerus Corporation (CERS) has a higher volatility of 15.56% compared to TechnipFMC plc (FTI) at 10.41%. This indicates that CERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CERS | FTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.56% | 10.41% | +5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.96% | 22.18% | +31.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.47% | 32.12% | +43.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.80% | 42.33% | +27.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 47.76% | +15.44% |
Dividends
CERS vs. FTI - Dividend Comparison
CERS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERS Cerus Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.30% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
Financials
CERS vs. FTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerus Corporation and TechnipFMC plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CERS vs. FTI - Profitability Comparison
CERS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a gross profit of 27.89M and revenue of 53.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.
CERS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported an operating income of -354.00K and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.7%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
CERS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerus Corporation reported a net income of -1.64M and revenue of 53.66M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CERS and FTI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CERS has higher volatility (15.56%) compared to FTI (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERS dropped -99.28% vs FTI's -91.74%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CERS and FTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer