PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACU vs. NL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACU vs. NL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acme United Corporation (ACU) and NL Industries, Inc. (NL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACU achieves a 42.60% return, which is significantly higher than NL's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ACU has outperformed NL with an annualized return of 12.42%, while NL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.26% annualized return.


ACU

1D
1.12%
1M
19.43%
6M
37.00%
YTD
42.60%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
24.58%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
12.42%
ALL TIME*
5.33%

NL

1D
-3.20%
1M
-8.60%
6M
-2.39%
YTD
8.49%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.06M$1.17M$1.01M
$195.28K$193.41K$414.53K

ACU vs. NL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACU
Acme United Corporation
42.60%9.67%-11.61%100.21%-33.82%13.48%29.39%71.41%-37.83%-6.95%
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
8.49%-22.99%54.90%-13.51%-1.26%60.39%27.43%11.40%-75.37%74.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ACU and NL is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.06

The correlation between ACU and NL shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACU:

$216.66M

NL:

$280.47M

EPS

ACU:

$2.37

NL:

-$0.70

PS Ratio

ACU:

1.11

NL:

1.77

PB Ratio

ACU:

1.94K

NL:

0.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACU:

$211.60M

NL:

$158.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACU:

$84.82M

NL:

$49.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACU:

$21.43M

NL:

$3.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACU vs. NL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACU
ACU Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ACU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACU Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ACU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NL
NL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
NL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACU vs. NL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acme United Corporation (ACU) and NL Industries, Inc. (NL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACUNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.08

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

0.17

+5.03

ACU vs. NL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACU Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the NL Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACU and NL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACU vs. NL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACU drawdown since its inception was -91.05%, roughly equal to the maximum NL drawdown of -89.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACU and NL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACUNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.05%

-89.08%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.05%

-33.22%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.71%

-38.90%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.23%

-52.49%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.47%

-84.70%

+32.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-50.01%

+44.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.81%

-43.82%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

15.25%

-6.83%

Volatility

ACU vs. NL - Volatility Comparison

Acme United Corporation (ACU) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to NL Industries, Inc. (NL) at 11.88%. This indicates that ACU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACUNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.18%

11.88%

+5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

43.37%

-18.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.90%

55.20%

-20.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.05%

48.58%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.57%

63.45%

-20.88%

Dividends

ACU vs. NL - Dividend Comparison

ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than NL's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.13%1.54%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%
NL
NL Industries, Inc.
10.28%10.42%9.65%4.99%9.25%3.24%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ACU vs. NL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acme United Corporation and NL Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ACU vs. NL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acme United Corporation and NL Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.69M and revenue of 62.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.

NL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.25M and revenue of 40.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 6.83M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

NL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.11M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 5.05M and revenue of 62.72M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

NL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NL Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.34M and revenue of 40.57M, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACU and NL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACU has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to NL (11.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACU dropped -91.05% vs NL's -89.08%.

ACU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACU and NL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer