CCFAX vs. PALDX
CCFAX (American Funds College 2036 Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, CCFAX returned 7.13%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCFAX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCFAX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 6.25% return.
CCFAX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCFAX American Funds College 2036 Fund | 5.62% | 16.36% | 13.70% | 19.10% | -18.41% | 12.44% | 16.77% | 22.43% | -9.10% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 6.25% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCFAX and PALDX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CCFAX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCFAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
CCFAX
PALDX
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCFAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.08 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 14.21 | -3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCFAX drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, roughly equal to the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFAX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCFAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -26.16% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -5.96% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.04% | -16.06% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.34% | -20.47% | -4.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -1.52% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -4.07% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 1.29% | +0.22% |
Volatility
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) is 2.99%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that CCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCFAX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.35% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 6.79% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.43% | 8.40% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 12.18% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 12.70% | +0.62% |
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCFAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCFAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
CCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than PALDX's 5.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCFAX American Funds College 2036 Fund | 6.72% | 7.10% | 5.41% | 1.75% | 4.66% | 7.82% | 4.37% | 2.61% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.10% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CCFAX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PALDX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to CCFAX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFAX dropped -25.80% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCFAX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer