PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCFAX vs. TAIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) and American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCFAX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than TAIAX's 6.28% return.


CCFAX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.96%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.25%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*

TAIAX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.87%
YTD
6.28%
6M
6.84%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CCFAX
American Funds College 2036 Fund
6.79%16.36%13.70%19.10%-18.41%12.44%16.77%22.43%-9.10%
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
6.28%13.27%10.09%11.74%-10.18%13.47%7.46%16.26%-1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CCFAX and TAIAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.94

The correlation between CCFAX and TAIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCFAX vs. TAIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCFAX
CCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIAX
TAIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TAIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) and American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCFAXTAIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.53

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.75

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

12.72

-0.15

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the TAIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCFAX and TAIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCFAXTAIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.65

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.92

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.06

-0.40

Drawdowns

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCFAX drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, which is greater than TAIAX's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFAX and TAIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCFAXTAIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.80%

-21.42%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-6.16%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-8.75%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.34%

-16.76%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-2.20%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.33%

+0.16%

Volatility

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) at 2.01%. This indicates that CCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCFAXTAIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

2.01%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.33%

5.30%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

6.41%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

7.62%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

8.19%

+5.14%

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCFAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIAX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCFAX vs. TAIAX - Dividend Comparison

CCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than TAIAX's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCFAX
American Funds College 2036 Fund
6.65%7.10%5.41%1.75%4.66%7.82%4.37%2.61%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
4.87%5.18%5.16%4.29%4.37%3.40%2.65%4.01%4.54%4.04%2.77%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CCFAX and TAIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCFAX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to TAIAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFAX dropped -25.80% vs TAIAX's -21.42%.

TAIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCFAX and TAIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer