CCFAX vs. MAGS
CCFAX (American Funds College 2036 Fund) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both funds - CCFAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, CCFAX returned 13.97%/yr vs 31.47%/yr for MAGS. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCFAX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCFAX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.67% return.
CCFAX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.56%
MAGS
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $304.05M | $305.41M | $288.45M |
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCFAX American Funds College 2036 Fund | 6.28% | 16.36% | 13.70% | 12.56% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.67% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCFAX and MAGS is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CCFAX and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCFAX vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
CCFAX
MAGS
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCFAX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.20 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 3.54 | +5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCFAX drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCFAX and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCFAX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -29.91% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -18.62% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.04% | -29.91% | +18.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -3.61% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.85% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 6.31% | -4.78% |
Volatility
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds College 2036 Fund (CCFAX) is 2.06%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that CCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCFAX | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 8.68% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 17.74% | -10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.48% | 22.36% | -13.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 26.15% | -14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 26.15% | -12.89% |
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCFAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCFAX vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
CCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCFAX American Funds College 2036 Fund | 6.68% | 7.10% | 5.41% | 1.75% | 4.66% | 7.82% | 4.37% | 2.61% | 1.20% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCFAX and MAGS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to CCFAX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCFAX dropped -25.80% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
CCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCFAX and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer