CCEF vs. CWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB).
CCEF and CWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCEF is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Jan 16, 2024. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009.
Performance
CCEF vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCEF vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | -0.88% | 13.47% | 18.80% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 2.86% | 16.61% | 11.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than CWB's 2.86% return.
CCEF
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 9.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWB
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCEF vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCEF vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank
CCEF
CWB
CCEF vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCEF | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 1.50 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 2.07 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.80 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 9.27 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCEF | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.50 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.84 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEF and CWB is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCEF vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than CWB's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF | 8.33% | 8.08% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.63% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
Drawdowns
CCEF vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum CWB drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CWB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEF | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -32.06% | +18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -7.52% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -4.16% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -6.22% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.27% | +0.21% |
Volatility
CCEF vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 4.62%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCEF | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 6.36% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.53% | 11.48% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 14.38% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 12.85% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 14.33% | -3.39% |