PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCEF vs. CVRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCEF vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 39.11% return.


CCEF

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.04%
6M
6.94%
1Y
15.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVRT

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.58%
YTD
39.11%
6M
36.22%
1Y
74.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEF vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
6.04%13.47%17.80%
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
39.11%29.37%16.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and CVRT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024

0.67

The correlation between CCEF and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCEF vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCEFCVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

8.70

-6.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

30.60

-21.80

CCEF vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CVRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCEFCVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-20.71%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.60%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-2.45%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-3.08%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.44%

-0.65%

Volatility

CCEF vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 2.58%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCEFCVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

8.70%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

18.69%

-11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.24%

22.59%

-14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

20.25%

-9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

20.25%

-9.47%

CCEF vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCEF vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than CVRT's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
7.96%8.08%6.55%0.00%
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.44%1.68%1.49%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCEF and CVRT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVRT has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to CCEF (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEF dropped -13.25% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 74.38% vs 15.76% for CCEF. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CCEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 74.38% return vs 15.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.96%, compared with 1.44% for CVRT.

CCEF is categorized as Dividend, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 2.74% for CCEF and 0.69% for CVRT.

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCEF and CVRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer