CCEF vs. CEFS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).

CCEF and CEFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCEF is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Jan 16, 2024. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.

Performance

CCEF vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCEF vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	-0.88%	13.47%	18.80%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	-0.33%	16.67%	23.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's -0.33% return.

CCEF

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.25%
• YTD: -0.88%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 9.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 17.06%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCEF vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.

CEFS

Saba Closed-End Funds ETF

CCEF

Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF

Return for Risk

CCEF vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 43
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 66
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCEF	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.11	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.54	-0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.25	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	1.43	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	6.94	-2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCEF vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCEF	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	1.11	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	0.70	+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and CEFS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CCEF vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than CEFS's 8.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	8.33%	8.08%	6.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	8.01%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCEF	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-38.99%	+25.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-9.80%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.60%	-3.75%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-3.73%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	2.02%	+0.46%

Volatility

CCEF vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCEF	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	4.75%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	7.46%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.79%	13.15%	-0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	12.99%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.94%	15.38%	-4.44%