CCEF vs. CEFS

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 4.29% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CCEF has a 2.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, less than CEFS's 8.65% yield.

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 2.97%. This indicates that CCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.