CCEF vs. PG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).

CCEF is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Jan 16, 2024.

Performance

CCEF vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCEF vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	-0.88%	13.47%	18.80%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	1.50%	-12.26%	14.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEF achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 1.50% return.

CCEF

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.25%
• YTD: -0.88%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 9.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PG

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -13.61%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: -4.66%
• 1Y: -12.92%
• 3Y*: 1.60%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CCEF vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 43
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 16
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCEF vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCEF	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	-0.69	+1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	-0.85	+1.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.90	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	-0.64	+1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	-1.19	+5.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCEF vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEF and PG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCEF	PG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	-0.69	+1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	0.46	+0.83

Correlation

The correlation between CCEF and PG is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCEF vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than PG's 2.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	8.33%	8.08%	6.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.93%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Drawdowns

CCEF vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEF drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEF and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCEF	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-54.25%	+41.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.43%	-18.31%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.60%	-16.91%	+11.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-12.15%	+10.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	9.85%	-7.37%

Volatility

CCEF vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) is 4.62%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that CCEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCEF	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	5.74%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	13.45%	-6.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.79%	18.87%	-6.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	17.45%	-6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.94%	18.85%	-7.91%