CCC vs. FLTR
CCC (CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 3 years, CCC returned -26.12%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCC vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCC achieves a -44.91% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return.
CCC
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- -44.91%
- 6M
- -45.32%
- 1Y
- -52.49%
- 3Y*
- -26.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
CCC vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCC CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc | -44.91% | -32.23% | 2.99% | 30.92% | -23.62% | 16.58% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCC and FLTR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCC vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
CCC
FLTR
CCC vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCC | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 3.03 | -2.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 16.82 | -17.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 98.58 | -100.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCC vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCC drawdown since its inception was -68.39%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCC and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCC | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.39% | -17.84% | -50.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.93% | -0.31% | -57.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.39% | -1.93% | -66.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.19% | -0.00% | -67.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.52% | -0.67% | -24.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.88% | 0.05% | +31.83% |
Volatility
CCC vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) has a higher volatility of 15.16% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that CCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCC | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.16% | 0.29% | +14.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.03% | 0.66% | +44.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.17% | 0.80% | +49.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.90% | 2.13% | +35.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.90% | 5.00% | +32.90% |
Dividends
CCC vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
CCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCC CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCC and FLTR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCC has higher volatility (15.16%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCC dropped -68.39% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCC and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer