PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCC vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCC vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCC achieves a -37.23% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 43.79% return.


CCC

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-37.23%
6M
-33.99%
1Y
-43.36%
3Y*
-23.39%
5Y*
10Y*

ESLT

1D
-2.28%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
43.79%
6M
73.18%
1Y
97.75%
3Y*
62.84%
5Y*
46.04%
10Y*
25.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCC vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCC
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc
-37.23%-32.23%2.99%30.92%-23.62%13.22%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
43.79%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%32.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CCC and ESLT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCC:

$3.03B

ESLT:

$39.93B

EPS

CCC:

$0.05

ESLT:

$12.36

PE Ratio

CCC:

91.73

ESLT:

67.12

PS Ratio

CCC:

2.91

ESLT:

4.79

PB Ratio

CCC:

1.76

ESLT:

9.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCC:

$1.09B

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCC:

$800.70M

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCC:

$237.18M

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCC vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCC
CCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCC vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCCESLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

2.33

-3.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.32

3.25

-4.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.39

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

3.78

-4.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.48

10.98

-12.45

CCC vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCC and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCESLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

2.33

-3.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.62

-0.98

Drawdowns

CCC vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCC drawdown since its inception was -68.39%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCC and ESLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.39%

-53.79%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.93%

-25.98%

-31.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.39%

-25.98%

-42.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.62%

-18.10%

-44.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-13.91%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.42%

8.94%

+20.48%

Volatility

CCC vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) at 16.07%. This indicates that CCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

16.07%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.73%

33.70%

+11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.38%

42.24%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.79%

33.12%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.79%

29.12%

+8.67%

Dividends

CCC vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

CCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCC
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.37%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%

Financials

CCC vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
281.27M
2.19B
(CCC) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCC vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.3%
25.2%
Portfolio components
CCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 208.88M and revenue of 281.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.3%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

CCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 48.82M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

CCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a net income of 15.42M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCC and ESLT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCC has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to ESLT (16.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCC dropped -68.39% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCC and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer