PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCC vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCC achieves a -37.23% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 0.72% return.


CCC

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-37.23%
6M
-33.99%
1Y
-43.36%
3Y*
-23.39%
5Y*
10Y*

LLY

1D
1.37%
1M
11.64%
YTD
0.72%
6M
4.73%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
32.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCC
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc
-37.23%-32.23%2.99%30.92%-23.62%13.22%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.72%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CCC and LLY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021

0.09

The correlation between CCC and LLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCC:

$3.03B

LLY:

$966.48B

EPS

CCC:

$0.05

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

CCC:

91.73

LLY:

38.33

PS Ratio

CCC:

2.91

LLY:

13.41

PB Ratio

CCC:

1.76

LLY:

30.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCC:

$1.09B

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCC:

$800.70M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCC:

$237.18M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCC
CCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCCLLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

1.19

-2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.32

1.75

-3.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.24

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.90

-2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.48

4.73

-6.20

CCC vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCC and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

1.19

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.57

-0.93

Drawdowns

CCC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCC drawdown since its inception was -68.39%, roughly equal to the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCC and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.39%

-68.24%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.93%

-23.64%

-34.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.39%

-34.48%

-33.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.62%

-4.26%

-58.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-19.22%

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.42%

9.49%

+19.93%

Volatility

CCC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.16%. This indicates that CCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

9.16%

+7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.73%

26.81%

+17.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.38%

37.88%

+11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.79%

32.79%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.79%

30.14%

+7.65%

Dividends

CCC vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

CCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCC
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.60%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

CCC vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
281.27M
19.80B
(CCC) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCC vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
74.3%
79.0%
Portfolio components
CCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 208.88M and revenue of 281.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.3%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

CCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 48.82M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

CCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a net income of 15.42M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCC and LLY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCC has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to LLY (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCC dropped -68.39% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCC and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer