CCC vs. QSR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CCC (CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc) and QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) are both stocks. CCC operates in Software - Application (Technology), while QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, CCC returned -23.39%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for QSR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCC vs. QSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCC achieves a -37.23% return, which is significantly lower than QSR's 7.58% return.

CCC

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -37.23%
• 6M: -31.64%
• 1Y: -43.68%
• 3Y*: -23.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QSR

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -9.11%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 1.76%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 9.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCC vs. QSR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCC CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc	-37.23%	-32.23%	2.99%	30.92%	-23.62%	13.22%
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc.	7.58%	8.64%	-13.80%	24.64%	10.72%	-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CCC and QSR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021	0.27

The correlation between CCC and QSR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCC : $3.03B QSR : $33.40B
EPS CCC : $0.05 QSR : $2.09
PE Ratio CCC : 91.73 QSR : 34.86
PS Ratio CCC : 2.91 QSR : 3.47
PB Ratio CCC : 1.76 QSR : 8.92
Total Revenue (TTM) CCC : $1.09B QSR : $9.59B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCC : $800.70M QSR : $3.17B
EBITDA (TTM) CCC : $237.18M QSR : $2.49B

Return for Risk

CCC vs. QSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCC

CCC Risk / Return Rank: 8
CCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CCC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QSR

QSR Risk / Return Rank: 46
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCC vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCC	QSR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	0.23	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	0.48	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.06	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	0.40	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	0.87	-2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCC vs. QSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the QSR Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCC and QSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCC	QSR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	0.23	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.34	-0.70

Drawdowns

CCC vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCC drawdown since its inception was -68.39%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCC and QSR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCC	QSR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.39%	-63.03%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.93%	-13.29%	-44.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.39%	-24.53%	-43.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.62%	-10.91%	-51.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.08%	-12.05%	-13.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.24%	6.04%	+23.20%

Volatility

CCC vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc (CCC) has a higher volatility of 17.15% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 8.20%. This indicates that CCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCC	QSR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.15%	8.20%	+8.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.76%	17.12%	+27.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.39%	23.05%	+26.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.80%	22.63%	+15.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.80%	27.52%	+10.28%

Dividends

CCC vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison

CCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCC CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc.	3.45%	3.63%	3.56%	2.82%	3.34%	3.49%	3.40%	3.14%	3.44%	1.27%	1.30%	1.18%

Financials

CCC vs. QSR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc and Restaurant Brands International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 208.88M and revenue of 281.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.3%.

QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 48.82M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

CCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc reported a net income of 15.42M and revenue of 281.27M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCC and QSR in my portfolio?

CCC and QSR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCC or QSR?

CCC has higher volatility (17.15%) compared to QSR (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCC dropped -68.39% vs QSR's -63.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.