PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATH vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATH vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 29.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 14.82%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.46% annualized return.


CATH

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
6.52%
6M
5.53%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
14.82%

SPHB

1D
-4.02%
1M
6.10%
YTD
29.05%
6M
26.31%
1Y
62.78%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
19.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATH vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
6.52%17.08%23.34%26.15%-19.96%28.87%18.80%30.64%-5.80%22.83%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
29.05%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and SPHB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.82

The correlation between CATH and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CATH vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CATH
SPHB

Technology

38.9%
46.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
13.2%

Communication Services

10.8%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
12.7%

Industrials

7.9%
14.8%

Healthcare

7.8%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.9%

Energy

3.2%
2.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

CATH
38.9%
SPHB
46.2%

Financial Services

CATH
11.3%
SPHB
13.2%

Communication Services

CATH
10.8%
SPHB
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CATH
10.0%
SPHB
12.7%

Industrials

CATH
7.9%
SPHB
14.8%

Healthcare

CATH
7.8%
SPHB
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

CATH
4.5%
SPHB
0.9%

Energy

CATH
3.2%
SPHB
2.2%

Utilities

CATH
2.1%
SPHB
2.4%

Real Estate

CATH
1.8%
SPHB

-

Basic Materials

CATH
1.7%
SPHB
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATH vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATHSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

5.90

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

22.17

-12.66

CATH vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATH vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATHSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-46.84%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-10.70%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-29.21%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

-31.49%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-46.84%

+12.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-4.02%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-8.48%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.84%

-0.67%

Volatility

CATH vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 4.71%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 11.78%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATHSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

11.78%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

19.72%

-9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

24.30%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

27.73%

-9.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

28.54%

-9.90%

CATH vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CATH vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than SPHB's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.79%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%0.00%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.54%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATH and SPHB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to CATH (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.46% vs 14.82% for CATH. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.

CATH has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.

CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATH and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer