CATH vs. SPYV
CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - CATH tracks the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.83%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
CATH vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 14.83%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.
CATH
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
CATH vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 8.63% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.55% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and SPYV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CATH and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
CATH vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CATH
SPYV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CATH
SPYV
Financial Services
CATH
SPYV
Communication Services
CATH
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
CATH
SPYV
Industrials
CATH
SPYV
Healthcare
CATH
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
CATH
SPYV
Energy
CATH
SPYV
Utilities
CATH
SPYV
Real Estate
CATH
SPYV
Basic Materials
CATH
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
SPYV
CATH vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATH | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.43 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 13.08 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATH vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -58.45% | +24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -6.22% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -17.54% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -17.89% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -36.89% | +2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.17% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -8.70% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.63% | +0.53% |
Volatility
CATH vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.94%. This indicates that CATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 2.94% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 7.33% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 9.96% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 14.40% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 16.95% | +1.69% |
CATH vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATH vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SPYV's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.77% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.69% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CATH and SPYV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CATH has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SPYV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.83% vs 11.89% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.77% for CATH.
CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATH and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer