PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATH vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATH vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CATH has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 14.83%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


CATH

1D
1.08%
1M
1.60%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.68%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
14.83%

SPYV

1D
0.21%
1M
1.26%
YTD
7.55%
6M
8.01%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATH vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
8.63%17.08%23.34%26.15%-19.96%28.87%18.80%30.64%-5.80%22.83%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.55%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and SPYV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.82

The correlation between CATH and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

CATH vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CATH
SPYV

Technology

38.9%
22.4%

Financial Services

11.3%
14.5%

Communication Services

10.8%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.1%

Industrials

7.9%
10.5%

Healthcare

7.8%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.9%

Energy

3.2%
7.0%

Utilities

2.1%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.3%

Technology

CATH
38.9%
SPYV
22.4%

Financial Services

CATH
11.3%
SPYV
14.5%

Communication Services

CATH
10.8%
SPYV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CATH
10.0%
SPYV
11.1%

Industrials

CATH
7.9%
SPYV
10.5%

Healthcare

CATH
7.8%
SPYV
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

CATH
4.5%
SPYV
8.9%

Energy

CATH
3.2%
SPYV
7.0%

Utilities

CATH
2.1%
SPYV
4.3%

Real Estate

CATH
1.8%
SPYV
3.4%

Basic Materials

CATH
1.7%
SPYV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATH vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATHSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.43

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

13.08

-1.97

CATH vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATH vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATHSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-58.45%

+24.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-6.22%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-17.54%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

-17.89%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-36.89%

+2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.17%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-8.70%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.63%

+0.53%

Volatility

CATH vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.94%. This indicates that CATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATHSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.94%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

7.33%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

9.96%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

14.40%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

16.95%

+1.69%

CATH vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CATH vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SPYV's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.77%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATH and SPYV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CATH has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to SPYV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.83% vs 11.89% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.77% for CATH.

CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATH and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer