CATH vs. FXAIX
CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both S&P 500 funds - CATH tracks the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index while FXAIX tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.83%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for FXAIX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.
Performance
CATH vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CATH having a 8.63% return and FXAIX slightly higher at 9.01%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CATH having a 14.83% annualized return and FXAIX not far ahead at 15.53%.
CATH
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
FXAIX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
CATH vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 8.63% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 9.01% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 26.29% | -18.14% | 28.71% | 18.42% | 31.48% | -4.43% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and FXAIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CATH and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
FXAIX
CATH vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATH | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.88 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 13.04 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATH vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and FXAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -33.79% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -8.89% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -18.76% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -24.50% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -33.79% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -2.42% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -3.79% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.96% | +0.20% |
Volatility
CATH vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.71% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 9.86% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.46% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 17.01% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 18.11% | +0.53% |
CATH vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATH vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than FXAIX's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.77% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.05% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CATH and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FXAIX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to CATH (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.
FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATH and FXAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer