CATH vs. CABA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA).

CATH is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2016.

Performance

CATH vs. CABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CATH vs. CABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	-4.96%	17.08%	23.34%	26.15%	-19.96%	28.87%	18.80%	6.19%
CABA Cabaletta Bio, Inc.	22.83%	-3.52%	-90.00%	145.41%	144.06%	-69.63%	-10.67%	39.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than CABA's 22.83% return.

CATH

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: -4.96%
• 6M: -3.12%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: —

CABA

• 1D: 8.91%
• 1M: -18.98%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 14.96%
• 1Y: 94.22%
• 3Y*: -31.23%
• 5Y*: -25.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CATH vs. CABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATH

CATH Risk / Return Rank: 59
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CABA

CABA Risk / Return Rank: 73
CABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CABA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CABA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATH vs. CABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CATH	CABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.82	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.05	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.24	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.59	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	2.77	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CATH vs. CABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATH Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the CABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATH and CABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CATH	CABA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.82	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	-0.23	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	-0.17	+0.89

Correlation

The correlation between CATH and CABA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CATH vs. CABA - Dividend Comparison

CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while CABA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	0.88%	0.84%	0.95%	1.16%	1.34%	1.03%	1.23%	0.68%	2.01%	1.27%	0.50%
CABA Cabaletta Bio, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CATH vs. CABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum CABA drawdown of -96.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and CABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CATH	CABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-96.63%	+62.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-46.37%	+34.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.14%	-95.90%	+67.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.76%	-89.40%	+82.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-58.92%	+53.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	26.53%	-23.89%

Volatility

CATH vs. CABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 5.38%, while Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) has a volatility of 20.56%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CATH	CABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	20.56%	-15.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	78.26%	-68.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.81%	115.96%	-97.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	112.81%	-94.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	110.00%	-91.38%