CATH vs. VTI
CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CATH returned 14.83%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CATH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
CATH vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATH achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CATH having a 14.83% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 15.07%.
CATH
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
VTI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
CATH vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 8.63% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.70% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATH and VTI is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CATH and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
CATH vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CATH
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CATH
VTI
Financial Services
CATH
VTI
Communication Services
CATH
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
CATH
VTI
Industrials
CATH
VTI
Healthcare
CATH
VTI
Consumer Defensive
CATH
VTI
Energy
CATH
VTI
Utilities
CATH
VTI
Real Estate
CATH
VTI
Basic Materials
CATH
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATH vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
CATH
VTI
CATH vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.07 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 13.75 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATH vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATH drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATH and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -55.45% | +21.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -8.92% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -19.30% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | -25.36% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -35.00% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.17% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -8.01% | +2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.99% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CATH vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) is 4.54%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that CATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATH | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.84% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 10.03% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.74% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 17.50% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 18.35% | +0.29% |
CATH vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATH vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
CATH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than VTI's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.77% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CATH and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to CATH (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATH dropped -33.95% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.07% vs 14.83% for CATH. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for CATH.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.77% for CATH.
CATH is categorized as S&P 500, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CATH and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATH and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer