CAMT vs. CLS
CAMT (Camtek Ltd) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CAMT in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, CAMT returned 57.85%/yr vs 43.71%/yr for CLS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAMT vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 81.74% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 57.85%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 43.71% annualized return.
CAMT
- 1D
- 4.95%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 81.74%
- 6M
- 72.64%
- 1Y
- 163.17%
- 3Y*
- 80.82%
- 5Y*
- 38.31%
- 10Y*
- 57.85%
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
CAMT vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 81.74% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMT and CLS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.27 |
The correlation between CAMT and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAMT:
$9.95B
CLS:
$45.48B
CAMT:
$0.98
CLS:
$8.28
CAMT:
197.59
CLS:
47.45
CAMT:
40.27
CLS:
0.64
CAMT:
19.03
CLS:
3.30
CAMT:
14.57
CLS:
21.68
CAMT:
$499.09M
CLS:
$13.81B
CAMT:
$250.68M
CLS:
$1.60B
CAMT:
$122.77M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAMT vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
CAMT
CLS
CAMT vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAMT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 6.91 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.84 | 16.83 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAMT vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.71% | -96.93% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.07% | -29.24% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -53.96% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.16% | -53.96% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.16% | -80.60% | +17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -16.78% | +9.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.71% | -73.31% | +17.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 11.98% | -0.93% |
Volatility
CAMT vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) is 25.19%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that CAMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAMT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.19% | 27.54% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.30% | 55.42% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.64% | 72.65% | -9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.76% | 57.70% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.98% | 49.97% | +2.01% |
Dividends
CAMT vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAMT nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CAMT vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camtek Ltd and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAMT vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
CAMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
CAMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
CAMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAMT and CLS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to CAMT (25.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAMT and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer