CAMT vs. CANE
Compare and contrast key facts about Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE).
CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAMT or CANE.
Performance
CAMT vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of 39.14%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.18% annualized return.
CAMT
10.62%
-6.32%
-27.54%
20.47%
50.32%
39.14%
CANE
1.77%
-0.32%
11.58%
-16.64%
13.47%
-0.18%
Key characteristics
| CAMT | CANE | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.34 | -0.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | -0.99 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 0.89 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.40 | -0.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.83 | -0.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 23.43% | 18.26% |
| Daily Std Dev | 56.19% | 23.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.74% | -81.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -44.98% | -52.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CAMT and CANE is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAMT vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAMT vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
CAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CAMT vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and CANE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAMT vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 6.08%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.