CAMT vs. CANE

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a -17.12% return, which is significantly lower than CANE's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of 35.32%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is comparable to the CANE Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and CANE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CAMT nor CANE has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and CANE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 30.14% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 5.63%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.