CAMT vs. ONTO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO).

Performance

CAMT vs. ONTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAMT vs. ONTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAMT Camtek Ltd	42.56%	31.66%	18.33%	215.94%	-52.30%	110.13%	102.31%	63.19%	20.41%	77.72%
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.	29.91%	-5.29%	9.01%	124.56%	-32.74%	112.89%	30.13%	33.70%	9.67%	-0.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CAMT : $7.58B ONTO : $10.16B
EPS CAMT : $1.05 ONTO : $2.78
PE Ratio CAMT : 144.52 ONTO : 73.81
PEG Ratio CAMT : 29.45 ONTO : 6.62
PS Ratio CAMT : 14.78 ONTO : 10.04
PB Ratio CAMT : 12.28 ONTO : 4.84
Total Revenue (TTM) CAMT : $496.07M ONTO : $1.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAMT : $250.32M ONTO : $499.77M
EBITDA (TTM) CAMT : $128.20M ONTO : $188.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 42.56% return, which is significantly higher than ONTO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed ONTO with an annualized return of 55.02%, while ONTO has yielded a comparatively lower 29.67% annualized return.

CAMT

• 1D: 4.95%
• 1M: -9.43%
• YTD: 42.56%
• 6M: 44.32%
• 1Y: 158.59%
• 3Y*: 75.83%
• 5Y*: 36.15%
• 10Y*: 55.02%

ONTO

• 1D: 8.35%
• 1M: -5.01%
• YTD: 29.91%
• 6M: 58.70%
• 1Y: 69.00%
• 3Y*: 32.64%
• 5Y*: 24.01%
• 10Y*: 29.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CAMT vs. ONTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMT

CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ONTO

ONTO Risk / Return Rank: 75
ONTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ONTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ONTO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ONTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ONTO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMT vs. ONTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAMT	ONTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.00	+1.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	1.58	+1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.95	2.02	+3.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.29	4.20	+12.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAMT vs. ONTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the ONTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and ONTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAMT	ONTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.00	+1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.44	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	0.59	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.20	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CAMT and ONTO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAMT vs. ONTO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAMT nor ONTO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAMT Camtek Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.57%	2.07%	2.45%
ONTO Onto Innovation Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CAMT vs. ONTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ONTO drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and ONTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMT	ONTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.71%	-98.56%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-33.64%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.16%	-62.82%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.16%	-62.82%	-0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.44%	-13.85%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.07%	-54.98%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.64%	16.20%	-6.56%

Volatility

CAMT vs. ONTO - Volatility Comparison

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) have volatilities of 22.81% and 22.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMT	ONTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.81%	22.54%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.96%	41.71%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.81%	69.14%	-7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.64%	54.81%	-0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.53%	50.78%	+0.75%

Financials

CAMT vs. ONTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camtek Ltd and Onto Innovation Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 64.10M and revenue of 128.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.0%.

ONTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a gross profit of 123.79M and revenue of 266.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 31.68M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

ONTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported an operating income of 13.86M and revenue of 266.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.

ONTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a net income of 10.53M and revenue of 266.87M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.