CAMT vs. POOL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Pool Corporation (POOL).

Performance

CAMT vs. POOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Pool Corporation (POOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAMT vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAMT Camtek Ltd	42.56%	31.66%	18.33%	215.94%	-52.30%	110.13%	102.31%	63.19%	20.41%	77.72%
POOL Pool Corporation	-11.02%	-31.81%	-13.39%	33.51%	-46.03%	52.98%	76.95%	44.50%	15.97%	25.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CAMT : $7.58B POOL : $7.46B
EPS CAMT : $1.05 POOL : $10.91
PE Ratio CAMT : 144.52 POOL : 18.54
PS Ratio CAMT : 14.78 POOL : 1.42
PB Ratio CAMT : 12.28 POOL : 6.30
Total Revenue (TTM) CAMT : $496.07M POOL : $5.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) CAMT : $250.32M POOL : $1.57B
EBITDA (TTM) CAMT : $128.20M POOL : $616.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 42.56% return, which is significantly higher than POOL's -11.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed POOL with an annualized return of 55.02%, while POOL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.

CAMT

• 1D: 4.95%
• 1M: -9.43%
• YTD: 42.56%
• 6M: 44.32%
• 1Y: 158.59%
• 3Y*: 75.83%
• 5Y*: 36.15%
• 10Y*: 55.02%

POOL

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -10.41%
• YTD: -11.02%
• 6M: -34.03%
• 1Y: -35.24%
• 3Y*: -14.84%
• 5Y*: -9.33%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CAMT vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMT

CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

POOL

POOL Risk / Return Rank: 6
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMT vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAMT	POOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	-1.03	+3.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	-1.47	+4.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.82	+0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.95	-0.87	+6.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.29	-1.78	+18.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAMT vs. POOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the POOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and POOL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAMT	POOL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	-1.03	+3.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	-0.28	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	0.32	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.58	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between CAMT and POOL is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CAMT vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison

CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAMT Camtek Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.57%	2.07%	2.45%	0.00%	0.00%
POOL Pool Corporation	2.47%	2.16%	1.38%	1.08%	1.26%	0.53%	0.61%	0.99%	1.16%	1.10%	1.14%	1.24%

Drawdowns

CAMT vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than POOL's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and POOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMT	POOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.71%	-75.71%	-22.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-39.78%	+13.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.16%	-63.57%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.16%	-63.57%	+0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.44%	-62.91%	+47.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.07%	-18.07%	-38.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.64%	19.36%	-9.72%

Volatility

CAMT vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 22.81% compared to Pool Corporation (POOL) at 6.56%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMT	POOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.81%	6.56%	+16.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.96%	24.10%	+19.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.81%	34.42%	+27.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.64%	33.62%	+21.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.53%	31.24%	+20.29%

Financials

CAMT vs. POOL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camtek Ltd and Pool Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 64.10M and revenue of 128.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.0%.

POOL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 295.75M and revenue of 982.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.1%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 31.68M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

POOL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 52.01M and revenue of 982.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 128.12M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.

POOL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 31.59M and revenue of 982.21M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.