PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMT vs. POOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAMT vs. POOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Pool Corporation (POOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMT achieves a 72.50% return, which is significantly higher than POOL's -19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMT has outperformed POOL with an annualized return of 58.39%, while POOL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.


CAMT

1D
-2.17%
1M
0.41%
YTD
72.50%
6M
56.89%
1Y
169.62%
3Y*
86.90%
5Y*
37.88%
10Y*
58.39%

POOL

1D
0.61%
1M
-10.43%
YTD
-19.95%
6M
-25.55%
1Y
-39.50%
3Y*
-16.55%
5Y*
-15.08%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMT vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
72.50%31.66%18.33%215.94%-52.30%110.13%102.31%63.19%20.41%77.72%
POOL
Pool Corporation
-19.95%-31.81%-13.39%33.51%-46.03%52.98%76.95%44.50%15.97%25.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMT and POOL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000

0.19

The correlation between CAMT and POOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAMT:

$9.44B

POOL:

$6.58B

EPS

CAMT:

$0.98

POOL:

$10.96

PE Ratio

CAMT:

187.55

POOL:

16.48

PS Ratio

CAMT:

18.06

POOL:

1.25

PB Ratio

CAMT:

13.83

POOL:

5.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAMT:

$499.09M

POOL:

$5.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAMT:

$250.68M

POOL:

$1.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAMT:

$122.77M

POOL:

$636.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMT vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMT
CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

POOL
POOL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMT vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camtek Ltd (CAMT) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAMTPOOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.79

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.31

-0.85

+7.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.89

-1.57

+17.47

CAMT vs. POOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the POOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMT and POOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAMTPOOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

-1.19

+3.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

-0.45

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

0.26

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.57

-0.35

Drawdowns

CAMT vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMT drawdown since its inception was -97.71%, which is greater than POOL's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMT and POOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMTPOOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.71%

-75.71%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.07%

-46.86%

+19.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.16%

-56.77%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.16%

-67.85%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.16%

-67.85%

+4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.57%

-66.63%

+55.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-18.32%

-37.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.72%

25.15%

-14.43%

Volatility

CAMT vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison

Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a higher volatility of 29.35% compared to Pool Corporation (POOL) at 11.00%. This indicates that CAMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMTPOOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.35%

11.00%

+18.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.52%

26.09%

+22.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.21%

33.30%

+28.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.44%

33.87%

+21.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.79%

31.52%

+20.27%

Dividends

CAMT vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison

CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
0.00%0.00%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.57%2.07%2.45%0.00%0.00%
POOL
Pool Corporation
2.79%2.16%1.38%1.08%1.26%0.53%0.61%0.99%1.16%1.10%1.14%1.24%

Financials

CAMT vs. POOL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Camtek Ltd and Pool Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
121.66M
1.14B
(CAMT) Total Revenue
(POOL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CAMT vs. POOL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Camtek Ltd and Pool Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
50.1%
29.0%
Portfolio components
CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

POOL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported a gross profit of 329.87M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

POOL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported an operating income of 82.61M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

POOL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pool Corporation reported a net income of 53.23M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAMT and POOL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMT has higher volatility (29.35%) compared to POOL (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMT dropped -97.71% vs POOL's -75.71%.

CAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMT and POOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer