CAH vs. MET
CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. CAH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CAH returned 14.31%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for MET. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAH vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly lower than MET's 14.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAH having a 14.31% annualized return and MET not far behind at 14.00%.
CAH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 40.25%
- 3Y*
- 38.77%
- 5Y*
- 33.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
MET
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
CAH vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 9.47% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 14.21% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAH and MET is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CAH and MET has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CAH:
$6.55
MET:
$7.21
CAH:
34.17
MET:
12.33
CAH:
0.81
MET:
0.41
CAH:
0.21
MET:
0.58
CAH:
$250.55B
MET:
$76.95B
CAH:
$9.23B
MET:
$14.75B
CAH:
$2.79B
MET:
$4.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAH vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
CAH
MET
CAH vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAH | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.13 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 0.91 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 2.48 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAH vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.93%, smaller than the maximum MET drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and MET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAH | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.93% | -82.37% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | -17.46% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.42% | -21.97% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.80% | -35.09% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.13% | -55.16% | +9.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | 0.00% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -17.62% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 6.42% | +1.33% |
Volatility
CAH vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.17%. This indicates that CAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAH | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 6.17% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 17.44% | +2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.30% | 23.16% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 25.72% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 30.70% | -1.44% |
Dividends
CAH vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than MET's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Financials
CAH vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAH vs. MET - Profitability Comparison
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAH and MET have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAH has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to MET (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAH dropped -61.93% vs MET's -82.37%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAH and MET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer