PortfoliosLab logo
CAH vs. BIIB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CAH and BIIB is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CAH vs. BIIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and Biogen Inc. (BIIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAH:

2.69

BIIB:

-1.61

Sortino Ratio

CAH:

3.48

BIIB:

-2.40

Omega Ratio

CAH:

1.48

BIIB:

0.73

Calmar Ratio

CAH:

3.37

BIIB:

-0.59

Martin Ratio

CAH:

16.18

BIIB:

-1.44

Ulcer Index

CAH:

3.78%

BIIB:

30.91%

Daily Std Dev

CAH:

22.19%

BIIB:

28.39%

Max Drawdown

CAH:

-61.58%

BIIB:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

CAH:

0.00%

BIIB:

-73.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAH:

$36.27B

BIIB:

$18.13B

EPS

CAH:

$6.40

BIIB:

$10.12

PE Ratio

CAH:

23.74

BIIB:

12.22

PEG Ratio

CAH:

0.78

BIIB:

6.24

PS Ratio

CAH:

0.16

BIIB:

1.85

PB Ratio

CAH:

16.07

BIIB:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAH:

$222.29B

BIIB:

$9.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAH:

$7.78B

BIIB:

$7.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAH:

$2.81B

BIIB:

$2.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 31.47% return, which is significantly higher than BIIB's -17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CAH has outperformed BIIB with an annualized return of 8.99%, while BIIB has yielded a comparatively lower -10.85% annualized return.


CAH

YTD

31.47%

1M

14.80%

6M

30.90%

1Y

59.07%

5Y*

29.48%

10Y*

8.99%

BIIB

YTD

-17.87%

1M

8.93%

6M

-21.50%

1Y

-45.41%

5Y*

-16.92%

10Y*

-10.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAH vs. BIIB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAH is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAH is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAH is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAH is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAH is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAH is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BIIB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIIB is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIIB is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIIB is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIIB is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIIB is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIIB is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAH vs. BIIB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAH Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the BIIB Sharpe Ratio of -1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAH and BIIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CAH vs. BIIB - Dividend Comparison

CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while BIIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.31%1.28%1.98%2.57%3.80%3.62%3.79%4.24%2.99%2.41%1.68%1.65%
BIIB
Biogen Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CAH vs. BIIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.58%, smaller than the maximum BIIB drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and BIIB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CAH vs. BIIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) is 7.45%, while Biogen Inc. (BIIB) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that CAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CAH vs. BIIB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and Biogen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20212022202320242025
54.88B
2.43B
(CAH) Total Revenue
(BIIB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CAH vs. BIIB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cardinal Health, Inc. and Biogen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
3.9%
74.1%
(CAH) Gross Margin
(BIIB) Gross Margin
CAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 54.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.9%.

BIIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 2.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

CAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 730.00M and revenue of 54.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

BIIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported an operating income of 625.20M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.

CAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 506.00M and revenue of 54.88B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

BIIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Biogen Inc. reported a net income of 240.50M and revenue of 2.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.