CAH vs. AZN
Compare and contrast key facts about Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAH or AZN.
Key characteristics
| CAH | AZN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.91% | 32.91% |
| 1Y Return | 31.73% | 31.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 32.73% | 17.15% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 25.12% | 17.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.40% | 12.52% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.45 | 1.53 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.17% | 19.56% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.69% | -48.94% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.57% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| CAH | AZN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27.49B | $271.67B |
| EPS | $3.46 | $2.06 |
| PE Ratio | 32.58 | 42.53 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.97 | 1.13 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $226.83B | $50.58B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.35B | $38.84B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.15B | $15.65B |
Correlation
The correlation between CAH and AZN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CAH vs. AZN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CAH achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than AZN's 32.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CAH has underperformed AZN with an annualized return of 7.40%, while AZN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAH vs. AZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAH vs. AZN - Dividend Comparison
CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than AZN's 1.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% | 1.65% | 1.77% |
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 1.69% | 2.15% | 2.14% | 2.40% | 2.80% | 2.81% | 3.61% | 3.95% | 5.01% | 4.06% | 3.98% | 4.72% |
Drawdowns
CAH vs. AZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAH drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, which is greater than AZN's maximum drawdown of -48.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAH and AZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAH vs. AZN - Volatility Comparison
Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) at 4.62%. This indicates that CAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CAH vs. AZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Health, Inc. and AstraZeneca PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities