CAG vs. CL
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CAG in Packaged Foods, CL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.11%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for CL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 16.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed CL with an annualized return of -5.11%, while CL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.38% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -13.95%
- 3Y*
- -18.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.91%
- 10Y*
- -5.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.76%
CL
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
CAG vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -10.31% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 16.61% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and CL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CAG and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAG:
$7.11B
CL:
$72.42B
CAG:
-$4.00
CL:
$2.59
CAG:
0.63
CL:
3.51
CAG:
1.12
CL:
502.49
CAG:
$11.28B
CL:
$20.80B
CAG:
$2.70B
CL:
$12.49B
CAG:
-$1.63B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
CL
CAG vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.07 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.42 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 0.75 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -58.91% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -16.97% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -29.05% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -29.05% | -33.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -29.05% | -33.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.76% | -12.80% | -42.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -11.24% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.74% | 9.46% | +8.28% |
Volatility
CAG vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 7.76%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 7.76% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.14% | 17.66% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 22.49% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 19.07% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 19.86% | +6.65% |
Dividends
CAG vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than CL's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.43% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.32% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
CAG vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAG vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.70M and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.63B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of -91.2%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -1.62B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of -56.1%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and CL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to CL (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs CL's -58.91%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer