PortfoliosLab logo
CAG vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CAG and GIS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CAG vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3,430.18%
6,489.20%
CAG
GIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAG:

-0.79

GIS:

-0.81

Sortino Ratio

CAG:

-0.97

GIS:

-1.03

Omega Ratio

CAG:

0.88

GIS:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

CAG:

-0.53

GIS:

-0.53

Martin Ratio

CAG:

-1.41

GIS:

-1.40

Ulcer Index

CAG:

13.30%

GIS:

12.61%

Daily Std Dev

CAG:

23.84%

GIS:

21.68%

Max Drawdown

CAG:

-56.95%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

CAG:

-33.92%

GIS:

-33.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAG:

$11.90B

GIS:

$30.88B

EPS

CAG:

$0.68

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

CAG:

35.96

GIS:

12.34

PEG Ratio

CAG:

0.34

GIS:

3.66

PS Ratio

CAG:

1.01

GIS:

1.57

PB Ratio

CAG:

1.33

GIS:

3.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAG:

$11.74B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAG:

$3.10B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAG:

$1.22B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -10.68% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 1.72%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.65% annualized return.


CAG

YTD

-10.68%

1M

-7.91%

6M

-14.76%

1Y

-17.42%

5Y*

-3.08%

10Y*

1.72%

GIS

YTD

-10.12%

1M

-4.03%

6M

-16.08%

1Y

-17.61%

5Y*

1.67%

10Y*

3.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAG vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAG is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAG is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAG is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAG is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAG vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAG, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CAG: -0.79
GIS: -0.86
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAG, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CAG: -0.97
GIS: -1.10
The chart of Omega ratio for CAG, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CAG: 0.88
GIS: 0.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAG, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CAG: -0.53
GIS: -0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for CAG, currently valued at -1.41, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CAG: -1.41
GIS: -1.46

The current CAG Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is comparable to the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAG and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.79
-0.86
CAG
GIS

Dividends

CAG vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than GIS's 4.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
7.16%5.05%4.75%3.32%3.44%2.52%2.48%3.98%2.19%1.97%2.37%2.76%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.28%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

CAG vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -56.95%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-33.92%
-33.31%
CAG
GIS

Volatility

CAG vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 7.77% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.77%
7.84%
CAG
GIS

Financials

CAG vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items