CAG vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAG or GIS.
Key characteristics
| CAG | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.70% | 9.23% |
| 1Y Return | -14.71% | -19.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.02% | 6.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.63% | 9.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.68% | 6.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.72 | -1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.55% | 18.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.94% | -45.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.00% | -20.11% |
Fundamentals
| CAG | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.62B | $39.47B |
| EPS | $1.99 | $4.36 |
| PE Ratio | 15.37 | 16.03 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.72 | 1.98 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.12B | $20.17B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.86B | $6.55B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.24B | $4.30B |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and GIS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CAG vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CAG having a 9.70% return and GIS slightly lower at 9.23%. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 5.68%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAG vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAG vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than GIS's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 4.56% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% | 2.97% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.38% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
CAG vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -56.94%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAG vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CAG vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities