Correlation
The correlation between CAG and SJM is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
CAG vs. SJM
Compare and contrast key facts about Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAG or SJM.
Performance
CAG vs. SJM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CAG:
-0.94
SJM:
0.25
CAG:
-1.26
SJM:
0.46
CAG:
0.85
SJM:
1.05
CAG:
-0.60
SJM:
0.13
CAG:
-1.55
SJM:
0.67
CAG:
15.08%
SJM:
6.67%
CAG:
24.16%
SJM:
24.65%
CAG:
-56.94%
SJM:
-45.66%
CAG:
-38.58%
SJM:
-24.43%
Fundamentals
CAG:
$10.69B
SJM:
$11.99B
CAG:
$0.68
SJM:
-$2.40
CAG:
0.31
SJM:
2.35
CAG:
0.91
SJM:
1.36
CAG:
1.22
SJM:
1.74
CAG:
$11.74B
SJM:
$6.58B
CAG:
$3.10B
SJM:
$2.56B
CAG:
$1.22B
SJM:
$323.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -16.98% return, which is significantly lower than SJM's 4.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed SJM with an annualized return of 0.36%, while SJM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.38% annualized return.
CAG
-16.98%
-7.05%
-16.07%
-22.10%
-7.97%
-3.49%
0.36%
SJM
4.35%
-1.30%
1.14%
6.68%
-0.19%
4.03%
2.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAG vs. SJM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CAG
SJM
CAG vs. SJM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CAG vs. SJM - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than SJM's 3.84% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 6.25% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.49% | 3.99% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% |
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 3.84% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
CAG vs. SJM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -56.94%, which is greater than SJM's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and SJM.
Loading data...
Volatility
CAG vs. SJM - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) at 5.41%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CAG vs. SJM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAG vs. SJM - Profitability Comparison
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 710.30M and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
SJM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 878.10M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 266.60M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
SJM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -594.00M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of -27.2%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 145.10M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
SJM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of -662.30M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.