CAG vs. SJM
Compare and contrast key facts about Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAG or SJM.
Performance
CAG vs. SJM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly higher than SJM's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed SJM with an annualized return of 2.97%, while SJM has yielded a comparatively higher 3.95% annualized return.
CAG
-0.84%
-6.99%
-9.73%
0.78%
2.58%
2.97%
SJM
-8.00%
-5.63%
2.14%
3.64%
3.88%
3.95%
Fundamentals
| CAG | SJM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.94B | $11.93B |
| EPS | $1.02 | $7.08 |
| PE Ratio | 26.59 | 15.83 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.32 | 1.58 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $11.94B | $6.56B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.27B | $2.43B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.27B | $1.47B |
Key characteristics
| CAG | SJM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | 0.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.22 | 0.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.18 | 0.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.31% | 10.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.21% | 22.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.94% | -45.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.69% | -26.29% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and SJM is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAG vs. SJM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAG vs. SJM - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than SJM's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 5.16% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.49% | 3.99% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% | 2.97% |
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 3.82% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 2.42% | 2.12% |
Drawdowns
CAG vs. SJM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -56.94%, which is greater than SJM's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and SJM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAG vs. SJM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is 5.37%, while The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that CAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CAG vs. SJM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conagra Brands, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities