CAG vs. PSCC
CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock, while PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Over the past 10 years, CAG returned -5.58%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for PSCC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAG vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAG achieves a -13.45% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CAG has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of -5.58%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.74% annualized return.
CAG
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -13.45%
- 1Y
- -19.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.47%
- 5Y*
- -11.42%
- 10Y*
- -5.58%
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 1.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
CAG vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -13.45% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 17.89% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAG and PSCC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.44 |
The correlation between CAG and PSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (10 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAG vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
CAG
PSCC
CAG vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAG | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.07 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.41 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 0.72 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAG vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAG drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAG and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAG | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.52% | -33.61% | -28.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -15.17% | -20.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.66% | -23.36% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.52% | -23.36% | -39.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.52% | -33.61% | -28.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.31% | -7.95% | -49.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.84% | -6.00% | -9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.27% | 8.69% | +8.58% |
Volatility
CAG vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a higher volatility of 12.70% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 6.12%. This indicates that CAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAG | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 6.12% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.29% | 11.96% | +12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.74% | 16.92% | +12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 18.35% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 19.35% | +7.13% |
Dividends
CAG vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
CAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than PSCC's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.77% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.66% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAG and PSCC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to PSCC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAG dropped -62.52% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
PSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAG and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer