CAFG vs. JHSC
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC).
CAFG and JHSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. JHSC is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both CAFG and JHSC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CAFG vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAFG vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 7.31% | 0.17% | 6.95% | 20.44% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 2.14% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 19.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than JHSC's 2.14% return.
CAFG
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAFG vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JHSC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAFG vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank
CAFG
JHSC
CAFG vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAFG | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.76 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 4.69 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAFG | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.76 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.35 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and JHSC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CAFG vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than JHSC's 1.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and JHSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAFG | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -42.66% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -14.36% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -7.32% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -7.90% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.59% | -0.19% |
Volatility
CAFG vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) at 6.20%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAFG | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 6.20% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 12.24% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 21.66% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 20.20% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 22.35% | -2.59% |