BUYZ vs. SPYG
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. BUYZ is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -6.77%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for SPYG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -13.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -14.51% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 40.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and SPYG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BUYZ and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
SPYG
Communication Services
BUYZ
SPYG
Technology
BUYZ
SPYG
Financial Services
BUYZ
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
SPYG
Industrials
BUYZ
SPYG
Real Estate
BUYZ
SPYG
Healthcare
BUYZ
SPYG
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
SPYG
Energy
BUYZ
-
SPYG
Utilities
BUYZ
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
SPYG
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.37 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.46 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 10.17 | -11.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 2.11 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.76 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.35 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -67.63% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -13.76% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -22.14% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -32.67% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.82% | -1.15% | -43.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -24.32% | -14.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | 3.32% | +11.88% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.34%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 4.34% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 12.46% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 16.06% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 21.16% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 20.64% | +9.27% |
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and SPYG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SPYG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs -6.77% for BUYZ. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs -6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer