BUYZ vs. SPY
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. BUYZ is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -7.01%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
BUYZ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -15.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -15.59%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -13.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- -7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
BUYZ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -15.59% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 111.45% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 28.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and SPY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BUYZ and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUYZ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
SPY
Communication Services
BUYZ
SPY
Technology
BUYZ
SPY
Financial Services
BUYZ
SPY
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
SPY
Industrials
BUYZ
SPY
Real Estate
BUYZ
SPY
Healthcare
BUYZ
SPY
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
SPY
Energy
BUYZ
-
SPY
Utilities
BUYZ
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
SPY
BUYZ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.43 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.16 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 14.72 | -15.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 2.38 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.82 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.59 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -55.19% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -8.88% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -18.76% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | -24.50% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.52% | -0.70% | -44.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -9.05% | -29.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | 1.91% | +13.22% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that BUYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 2.84% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.16% | 8.90% | +8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.18% | 11.83% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 17.05% | +10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 17.94% | +11.97% |
BUYZ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and SPY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUYZ has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs -7.01% for BUYZ. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs -7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer