BUYZ vs. XDAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT).

BUYZ and XDAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUYZ is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. XDAT is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 12, 2021.

Performance

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-19.76%	8.70%	28.25%	39.13%	-49.81%	-24.77%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	-18.50%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-45.71%	10.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -19.76% return, which is significantly lower than XDAT's -18.50% return.

BUYZ

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: -19.76%
• 6M: -26.49%
• 1Y: -6.09%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: -8.56%
• 10Y*: —

XDAT

• 1D: 4.09%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: -18.50%
• 6M: -24.76%
• 1Y: -5.98%
• 3Y*: 7.80%
• 5Y*: -2.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BUYZ and XDAT have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

BUYZ

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF

XDAT

Franklin Exponential Data ETF

Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. XDAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 8
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUYZ	XDAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.22	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	-0.14	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	0.98	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	-0.23	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	-0.60	+0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUYZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the XDAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUYZ and XDAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUYZ	XDAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	-0.22	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	-0.09	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	-0.11	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and XDAT is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUYZ nor XDAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than XDAT's maximum drawdown of -54.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and XDAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYZ	XDAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-54.87%	-13.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	-29.56%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.32%	-54.87%	-8.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.21%	-31.82%	-16.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.60%	-25.96%	-12.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.84%	11.21%	+0.63%

Volatility

BUYZ vs. XDAT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) have volatilities of 8.02% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUYZ	XDAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	8.21%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.26%	17.65%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.11%	27.05%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.49%	29.30%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.18%	29.45%	+0.73%