BUYZ vs. VGT
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUYZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. BUYZ is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUYZ returned -7.29%/yr vs 18.09%/yr for VGT. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
BUYZ vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -11.36% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- -11.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- -7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
VGT
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 22.59%
- YTD
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.87K | $14.14K | $15.68K | |
| $454.00M | $507.98M | $575.23M |
BUYZ vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -11.36% | 8.70% | 28.25% | 39.13% | -49.81% | -19.38% | 117.10% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.47% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 53.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and VGT is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUYZ and VGT has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BUYZ vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUYZ
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BUYZ
VGT
Communication Services
BUYZ
VGT
Technology
BUYZ
VGT
Financial Services
BUYZ
VGT
Consumer Defensive
BUYZ
VGT
-
Industrials
BUYZ
VGT
Real Estate
BUYZ
VGT
-
Healthcare
BUYZ
VGT
Basic Materials
BUYZ
-
VGT
Energy
BUYZ
-
VGT
Utilities
BUYZ
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
VGT
BUYZ vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUYZ | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.26 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.28 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 6.12 | -6.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -54.63% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -16.40% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | -27.23% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.04% | -35.07% | -27.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.79% | -8.34% | -34.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.89% | -7.95% | -30.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.83% | 6.09% | +11.74% |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) is 6.44%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that BUYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 8.34% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.12% | 20.11% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 24.25% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 25.85% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 24.90% | +4.88% |
BUYZ vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and VGT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to BUYZ (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUYZ dropped -68.04% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 18.09% vs -7.29% for BUYZ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BUYZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 18.09% return vs -7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
BUYZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer