BUYZ vs. MEME

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

BUYZ vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 31.77% return.

BUYZ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 2.85%
• 6M: 0.22%
• YTD: -10.19%
• 1Y: -12.12%
• 3Y*: 11.06%
• 5Y*: -7.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.84%

MEME

• 1D: 7.78%
• 1M: -2.62%
• 6M: 9.37%
• YTD: 31.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	$13.78K	$15.43K	$16.35K
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	$1.70M	$1.38M	$2.07M

BUYZ vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	-10.19%	-8.14%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	31.77%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BUYZ and MEME is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.35

BUYZ vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUYZ	MEME
Consumer Cyclical	40.0%	4.1%
Communication Services	22.3%	5.5%
Technology	15.2%	81.9%
Financial Services	9.0%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	-
Industrials	5.3%	7.2%
Real Estate	2.5%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	6.2%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Energy	-	4.8%
Utilities	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

BUYZ vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUYZ

BUYZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
BUYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BUYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BUYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUYZ vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUYZ	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.68	—	—

Drawdowns

BUYZ vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than MEME's maximum drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUYZ	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.04%	-50.08%	-17.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.03%	-30.76%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.89%	-29.30%	-9.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BUYZ	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.25%	79.62%	-56.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.28%	79.62%	-52.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.78%	79.62%	-49.84%

BUYZ vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUYZ vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUYZ nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUYZ and MEME in my portfolio?

BUYZ and MEME have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BUYZ or MEME?

On fees, BUYZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUYZ or MEME?

BUYZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUYZ or MEME?

BUYZ and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BUYZ and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.69% for MEME.