BUYZ vs. GQGU
BUYZ (Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. BUYZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUYZ achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 6.44% return.
BUYZ
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -13.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- -6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | -14.51% | -0.78% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.44% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUYZ and GQGU is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUYZ vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
BUYZ
GQGU
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF (BUYZ) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUYZ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUYZ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.58 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUYZ drawdown since its inception was -68.04%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUYZ and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUYZ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.04% | -6.65% | -61.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.82% | -4.80% | -40.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -2.55% | -36.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.20% | — | — |
Volatility
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUYZ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.22% | 10.12% | +12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 10.12% | +17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 10.12% | +19.79% |
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUYZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUYZ vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
BUYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUYZ and GQGU have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUYZ.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for BUYZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUYZ and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for BUYZ and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer