BOOT vs. XIACY
BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) and XIACY (Xiaomi Corporation) are both stocks. BOOT operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while XIACY operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 3 years, BOOT returned 29.89%/yr vs 33.84%/yr for XIACY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOOT vs. XIACY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly higher than XIACY's -33.94% return.
BOOT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 16.57%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -16.66%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
XIACY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -17.62%
- YTD
- -33.94%
- 6M
- -38.82%
- 1Y
- -49.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOOT vs. XIACY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -3.32% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 63.52% |
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | -33.94% | 15.23% | 118.16% | 45.75% | -42.42% | -35.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and XIACY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
BOOT:
$5.24B
XIACY:
$88.03B
BOOT:
$7.35
XIACY:
CN¥6.64
BOOT:
23.21
XIACY:
16.98
BOOT:
4.75
XIACY:
0.11
BOOT:
2.33
XIACY:
1.35
BOOT:
3.97
XIACY:
2.25
BOOT:
$2.25B
XIACY:
CN¥442.33B
BOOT:
$858.36M
XIACY:
CN¥97.61B
BOOT:
$358.43M
XIACY:
CN¥40.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOT vs. XIACY — Risk / Return Rank
BOOT
XIACY
BOOT vs. XIACY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOOT | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.77 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.87 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.43 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. XIACY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than XIACY's maximum drawdown of -71.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and XIACY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOT | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.73% | -71.03% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -58.00% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -58.00% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.97% | -57.85% | +39.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -39.31% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.87% | 35.09% | -21.22% |
Volatility
BOOT vs. XIACY - Volatility Comparison
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) at 10.81%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIACY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOOT | XIACY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 10.81% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 26.89% | +6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.52% | 39.10% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.90% | 46.49% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.02% | 46.49% | +10.53% |
Dividends
BOOT vs. XIACY - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOOT nor XIACY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BOOT vs. XIACY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Xiaomi Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOOT vs. XIACY - Profitability Comparison
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
XIACY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
XIACY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
XIACY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOOT and XIACY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOOT has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to XIACY (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs XIACY's -71.03%.
BOOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOOT and XIACY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer