BOOT vs. ANF

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -15.47% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -33.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 18.80%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 17.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the ANF Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and ANF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BOOT nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and ANF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 15.65% compared to Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) at 8.47%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.