BOOT vs. ANF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF).

Performance

BOOT vs. ANF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOOT vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	-18.68%	16.24%	97.79%	22.78%	-49.19%	183.79%	-2.63%	161.48%	2.53%	32.67%
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co.	-25.11%	-15.79%	69.43%	285.07%	-34.22%	71.07%	19.48%	-9.74%	19.24%	54.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOOT : $4.41B ANF : $4.41B
EPS BOOT : $7.12 ANF : $10.46
PE Ratio BOOT : 20.15 ANF : 9.01
PEG Ratio BOOT : 0.38 ANF : 0.00
PS Ratio BOOT : 2.03 ANF : 0.87
PB Ratio BOOT : 3.44 ANF : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) BOOT : $2.17B ANF : $5.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOOT : $831.18M ANF : $2.13B
EBITDA (TTM) BOOT : $347.67M ANF : $596.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -18.68% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -25.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed ANF with an annualized return of 30.99%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.70% annualized return.

BOOT

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -22.59%
• YTD: -18.68%
• 6M: -12.15%
• 1Y: 29.29%
• 3Y*: 23.26%
• 5Y*: 18.35%
• 10Y*: 30.99%

ANF

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: -25.11%
• 6M: 9.40%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: 50.32%
• 5Y*: 22.29%
• 10Y*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOOT vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOT

BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 62
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ANF

ANF Risk / Return Rank: 54
ANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ANF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ANF Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOT vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOOT	ANF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	0.29	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.00	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	0.63	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	1.21	+2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOOT vs. ANF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the ANF Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and ANF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOOT	ANF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	0.29	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.37	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.23	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.15	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and ANF is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BOOT vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOOT nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.98%	4.63%	3.99%	4.59%	6.67%	2.96%

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and ANF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOOT	ANF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.73%	-86.59%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.71%	-36.96%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.62%	-69.93%	+9.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.88%	-72.45%	-5.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.00%	-50.99%	+19.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.48%	-42.82%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.24%	19.30%	-9.06%

Volatility

BOOT vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is 11.86%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that BOOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOOT	ANF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.86%	13.87%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.03%	48.80%	-18.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.55%	67.48%	-16.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.75%	61.07%	-11.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.77%	60.95%	-3.18%

Financials

BOOT vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BOOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 281.24M and revenue of 705.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

ANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BOOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.78M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

ANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of 769.00K and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

BOOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 85.81M and revenue of 705.64M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

ANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 172.13M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.