BOOT vs. CORT
BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) and CORT (Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated) are both stocks. BOOT operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CORT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BOOT returned 35.85%/yr vs 28.46%/yr for CORT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOOT vs. CORT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than CORT's 104.60% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has outperformed CORT with an annualized return of 35.85%, while CORT has yielded a comparatively lower 28.46% annualized return.
BOOT
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 36.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 35.85%
CORT
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 38.47%
- YTD
- 104.60%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -0.67%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 26.78%
- 10Y*
- 28.46%
BOOT vs. CORT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -2.60% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | -2.63% | 161.48% | 2.53% | 32.67% |
CORT Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated | 104.60% | -30.94% | 55.14% | 59.92% | 2.58% | -24.31% | 116.20% | -9.43% | -26.02% | 148.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and CORT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
BOOT:
$5.28B
CORT:
$7.44B
BOOT:
$7.35
CORT:
$0.41
BOOT:
23.39
CORT:
173.61
BOOT:
4.78
CORT:
86.48
BOOT:
2.34
CORT:
10.74
BOOT:
4.00
CORT:
11.66
BOOT:
$2.25B
CORT:
$769.10M
BOOT:
$858.36M
CORT:
$755.64M
BOOT:
$358.43M
CORT:
$3.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOT vs. CORT — Risk / Return Rank
BOOT
CORT
BOOT vs. CORT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOOT | CORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | -0.01 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.64 | 0.56 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.13 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | -0.23 | +0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOOT | CORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | -0.01 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.43 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.11 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. CORT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, smaller than the maximum CORT drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and CORT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOT | CORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.73% | -94.28% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -64.40% | +29.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -71.85% | +22.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.62% | -71.85% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.88% | -71.85% | -6.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -37.66% | +20.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | -53.46% | +21.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.50% | 35.26% | -21.76% |
Volatility
BOOT vs. CORT - Volatility Comparison
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) have volatilities of 15.90% and 16.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOOT | CORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.90% | 16.27% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.56% | 85.02% | -52.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.85% | 76.90% | -34.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.78% | 74.50% | -24.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.04% | 67.21% | -10.17% |
Dividends
BOOT vs. CORT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOOT nor CORT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BOOT vs. CORT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOOT vs. CORT - Profitability Comparison
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 195.75M and revenue of 538.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
CORT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated reported a gross profit of 162.02M and revenue of 164.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.3%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.22M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
CORT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated reported an operating income of -49.60M and revenue of 164.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -30.1%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 44.44M and revenue of 538.75M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
CORT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated reported a net income of -31.20M and revenue of 164.90M, resulting in a net margin of -18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOOT and CORT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORT has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to BOOT (15.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs CORT's -94.28%.
BOOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOOT and CORT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer