PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BOOT vs. CORT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BOOTCORT
YTD Return73.18%68.69%
1Y Return75.81%115.88%
3Y Return (Ann)3.16%33.87%
5Y Return (Ann)26.18%27.29%
10Y Return (Ann)20.78%33.26%
Sharpe Ratio1.822.14
Sortino Ratio2.352.46
Omega Ratio1.341.38
Calmar Ratio1.823.07
Martin Ratio11.876.48
Ulcer Index7.11%17.82%
Daily Std Dev46.35%53.96%
Max Drawdown-83.73%-94.28%
Current Drawdown-20.79%-8.07%

Fundamentals


BOOTCORT
Market Cap$4.11B$6.05B
EPS$4.98$1.26
PE Ratio27.0345.87
PEG Ratio1.720.61
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.76B$628.56M
Gross Profit (TTM)$648.13M$618.75M
EBITDA (TTM)$276.20M$144.87M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BOOT and CORT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BOOT vs. CORT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 73.18% return, which is significantly higher than CORT's 68.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOT has underperformed CORT with an annualized return of 20.78%, while CORT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.02%
98.95%
BOOT
CORT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOOT vs. CORT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOOT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 11.87, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.87
CORT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CORT, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CORT, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CORT, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CORT, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CORT, currently valued at 6.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.48

BOOT vs. CORT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the CORT Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and CORT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.82
2.14
BOOT
CORT

Dividends

BOOT vs. CORT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOOT nor CORT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. CORT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, smaller than the maximum CORT drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and CORT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-20.79%
-8.07%
BOOT
CORT

Volatility

BOOT vs. CORT - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) at 15.51%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
23.72%
15.51%
BOOT
CORT

Financials

BOOT vs. CORT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items