XIACY vs. BYDDF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF).

Performance

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation	-17.82%	15.23%	118.16%	45.75%	-42.42%	-33.33%
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	12.29%	11.38%	24.71%	13.22%	-27.71%	18.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap XIACY : $108.12B BYDDF : $123.61B
EPS XIACY : $7.80 BYDDF : $4.99
PE Ratio XIACY : 2.65 BYDDF : 2.75
PEG Ratio XIACY : 0.02 BYDDF : 0.02
PS Ratio XIACY : 0.24 BYDDF : 0.11
PB Ratio XIACY : 0.41 BYDDF : 0.54
Total Revenue (TTM) XIACY : $455.08B BYDDF : $773.53B
Gross Profit (TTM) XIACY : $101.33B BYDDF : $116.36B
EBITDA (TTM) XIACY : $47.43B BYDDF : $100.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -17.82% return, which is significantly lower than BYDDF's 12.29% return.

XIACY

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: -17.82%
• 6M: -40.45%
• 1Y: -34.56%
• 3Y*: 39.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BYDDF

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: 13.55%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: -3.09%
• 1Y: -16.45%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 13.79%
• 10Y*: 23.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XIACY vs. BYDDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIACY

XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 14
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BYDDF

BYDDF Risk / Return Rank: 26
BYDDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BYDDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BYDDF Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BYDDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BYDDF Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIACY	BYDDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	-0.40	-0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	-0.31	-0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.96	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	-0.44	-0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	-0.66	-0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIACY Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the BYDDF Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIACY and BYDDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIACY	BYDDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	-0.40	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.20	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between XIACY and BYDDF is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Dividend Comparison

XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BYDDF BYD Company Limited	5.38%	6.04%	1.28%	0.58%	0.07%	0.07%	0.03%	0.58%	0.00%	2.03%

Drawdowns

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -70.71%, smaller than the maximum BYDDF drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and BYDDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIACY	BYDDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.71%	-86.78%	+16.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.29%	-41.23%	-8.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.57%	-28.53%	-19.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.43%	-41.05%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.77%	27.03%	-0.26%

Volatility

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) have volatilities of 14.54% and 14.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIACY	BYDDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.54%	14.62%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.33%	25.78%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.25%	41.84%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.87%	46.01%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.87%	47.07%	-0.20%

Financials

XIACY vs. BYDDF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xiaomi Corporation and BYD Company Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 24.03B and revenue of 115.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

BYDDF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 15.18B and revenue of 207.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

BYDDF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of -2.54B and revenue of 207.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 6.45B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

BYDDF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 8.45B and revenue of 207.40B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.