XIACY vs. BYDDF
XIACY (Xiaomi Corporation) and BYDDF (BYD Company Limited) are both stocks. XIACY operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while BYDDF operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, XIACY returned 0.68%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for BYDDF. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -29.46% return, which is significantly lower than BYDDF's -0.31% return.
XIACY
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 23.06%
- 6M
- -20.88%
- YTD
- -29.46%
- 1Y
- -47.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.78%
BYDDF
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BYDDF BYD Company Limited | $5.02M | $3.78M | $3.48M |
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | $7.13M | $6.60M | $6.61M |
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | -29.46% | 15.23% | 118.16% | 45.75% | -42.42% | -35.46% |
BYDDF BYD Company Limited | -0.31% | 11.38% | 24.71% | 13.22% | -27.71% | 27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIACY and BYDDF is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XIACY and BYDDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
XIACY:
$91.90B
BYDDF:
$109.87B
XIACY:
CN¥6.66
BYDDF:
CN¥3.02
XIACY:
17.99
BYDDF:
27.01
XIACY:
0.12
BYDDF:
0.20
XIACY:
1.43
BYDDF:
0.95
XIACY:
2.39
BYDDF:
2.98
XIACY:
CN¥442.33B
BYDDF:
CN¥783.83B
XIACY:
CN¥97.61B
BYDDF:
CN¥132.11B
XIACY:
CN¥40.74B
BYDDF:
CN¥68.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIACY vs. BYDDF — Risk / Return Rank
XIACY
BYDDF
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and BYD Company Limited (BYDDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIACY | BYDDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.96 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.39 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.83 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, smaller than the maximum BYDDF drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and BYDDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIACY | BYDDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.03% | -86.78% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.59% | -38.50% | -25.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.97% | -51.26% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.12% | -51.26% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.99% | -36.55% | -18.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.82% | -40.98% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.00% | 18.00% | +21.00% |
Volatility
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Volatility Comparison
Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a higher volatility of 17.48% compared to BYD Company Limited (BYDDF) at 9.71%. This indicates that XIACY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYDDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIACY | BYDDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.48% | 9.71% | +7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.89% | 27.83% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.30% | 36.12% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.87% | 44.88% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.71% | 47.18% | -0.47% |
Dividends
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Dividend Comparison
XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDF BYD Company Limited | 0.43% | 6.04% | 1.28% | 0.58% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 2.03% |
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xiaomi Corporation and BYD Company Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XIACY vs. BYDDF - Profitability Comparison
XIACY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
BYDDF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.
XIACY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
BYDDF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
XIACY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
BYDDF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BYD Company Limited reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XIACY and BYDDF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XIACY has higher volatility (17.48%) compared to BYDDF (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIACY dropped -71.03% vs BYDDF's -86.78%.
BYDDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIACY and BYDDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer