XIACY vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XIACY or COST.
Performance
XIACY vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a 78.14% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 41.42% return.
XIACY
78.14%
15.61%
45.95%
84.40%
N/A
N/A
COST
41.42%
4.80%
16.06%
63.40%
27.63%
23.47%
Fundamentals
| XIACY | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $90.76B | $411.21B |
| EPS | $0.51 | $16.56 |
| PE Ratio | 35.00 | 56.04 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.28 | 5.63 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $237.64B | $254.45B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $50.84B | $32.10B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $17.11B | $12.15B |
Key characteristics
| XIACY | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.56 | 3.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.28 | 3.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.20 | 6.27 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.72 | 16.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 12.15% | 3.97% |
| Daily Std Dev | 44.64% | 19.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.71% | -53.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.59% | -1.67% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between XIACY and COST is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XIACY vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XIACY vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.10% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
XIACY vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -70.71%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XIACY vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.22%. This indicates that XIACY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
XIACY vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xiaomi Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities