PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BOOT vs. VRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and VRT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

BOOT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.76%
28.44%
BOOT
VRT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BOOT:

2.01

VRT:

2.56

Sortino Ratio

BOOT:

2.49

VRT:

2.84

Omega Ratio

BOOT:

1.37

VRT:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

BOOT:

1.96

VRT:

3.89

Martin Ratio

BOOT:

11.25

VRT:

10.83

Ulcer Index

BOOT:

8.12%

VRT:

13.17%

Daily Std Dev

BOOT:

45.58%

VRT:

55.84%

Max Drawdown

BOOT:

-83.73%

VRT:

-71.24%

Current Drawdown

BOOT:

-11.82%

VRT:

-16.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BOOT:

$4.54B

VRT:

$47.28B

EPS

BOOT:

$4.97

VRT:

$1.44

PE Ratio

BOOT:

29.96

VRT:

83.81

PEG Ratio

BOOT:

1.72

VRT:

1.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOOT:

$1.76B

VRT:

$7.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOOT:

$648.13M

VRT:

$2.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOOT:

$262.88M

VRT:

$1.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 92.78% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 145.43% return.


BOOT

YTD

92.78%

1M

7.98%

6M

14.33%

1Y

91.81%

5Y*

27.22%

10Y*

23.23%

VRT

YTD

145.43%

1M

-15.96%

6M

32.16%

1Y

141.66%

5Y*

61.25%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOOT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.012.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.492.84
The chart of Omega ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.371.37
The chart of Calmar ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.963.89
The chart of Martin ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 11.25, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0011.2510.83
BOOT
VRT

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.01
2.56
BOOT
VRT

Dividends

BOOT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


TTM2023202220212020
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.82%
-16.76%
BOOT
VRT

Volatility

BOOT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is 12.90%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that BOOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
12.90%
13.67%
BOOT
VRT

Financials

BOOT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab