BOOT vs. VRT
BOOT (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. BOOT operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, BOOT returned 11.51%/yr vs 53.98%/yr for VRT. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BOOT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 49.17% return.
BOOT
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -16.52%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 1Y
- -12.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 31.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.35%
VRT
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -19.62%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- YTD
- 49.17%
- 1Y
- 70.80%
- 3Y*
- 109.07%
- 5Y*
- 53.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $132.03M | $108.32M | $122.03M | |
| $1.93B | $1.68B | $1.97B |
BOOT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | -15.57% | 16.24% | 97.79% | 22.78% | -49.19% | 183.79% | -2.63% | 161.48% | -28.98% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 49.17% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and VRT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between BOOT and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BOOT:
$4.51B
VRT:
$93.00B
BOOT:
$7.90
VRT:
$4.42
BOOT:
18.85
VRT:
54.63
BOOT:
3.86
VRT:
0.24
BOOT:
1.95
VRT:
8.24
BOOT:
3.36
VRT:
19.94
BOOT:
$2.34B
VRT:
$11.48B
BOOT:
$901.03M
VRT:
$4.31B
BOOT:
$382.15M
VRT:
$2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
BOOT
VRT
BOOT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOOT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.63 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 5.58 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.73% | -71.24% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -40.70% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.93% | -61.28% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.62% | -71.24% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.36% | -35.78% | +7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.20% | -16.29% | -15.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 12.00% | +4.14% |
Volatility
BOOT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is 10.86%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 24.48%. This indicates that BOOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOOT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 24.48% | -13.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.65% | 52.93% | -19.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.17% | 64.52% | -20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.06% | 63.43% | -13.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.82% | 55.31% | +1.51% |
Dividends
BOOT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
BOOT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOOT vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
BOOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 239.89M and revenue of 593.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.4%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
BOOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.53M and revenue of 593.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 637.90M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
BOOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 70.11M and revenue of 593.52M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 497.80M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOOT and VRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to BOOT (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOOT dropped -83.73% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOOT and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer