BOOT vs. VRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BOOT or VRT.
Key characteristics
| BOOT | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 73.18% | 152.21% |
| 1Y Return | 75.81% | 178.63% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.16% | 65.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 26.18% | 64.05% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.82 | 3.35 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.35 | 3.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.82 | 4.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.87 | 13.94 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.11% | 12.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 46.35% | 53.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.73% | -71.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.79% | -4.55% |
Fundamentals
| BOOT | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.11B | $47.59B |
| EPS | $4.98 | $1.46 |
| PE Ratio | 27.03 | 84.80 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.72 | 1.25 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.76B | $7.53B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $648.13M | $2.75B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $276.20M | $1.49B |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOT and VRT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BOOT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 73.18% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 152.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BOOT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BOOT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.08% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
BOOT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BOOT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 12.42%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BOOT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities