BOOT vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

BOOT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOOT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	-17.06%	16.24%	97.79%	22.78%	-49.19%	183.79%	-2.63%	161.48%	-27.07%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	-0.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BOOT : $4.50B VRT : $98.15B
EPS BOOT : $7.12 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio BOOT : 20.55 VRT : 73.44
PEG Ratio BOOT : 0.39 VRT : 0.32
PS Ratio BOOT : 2.07 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio BOOT : 3.50 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) BOOT : $2.17B VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) BOOT : $831.18M VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) BOOT : $347.67M VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a -17.06% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

BOOT

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -22.65%
• YTD: -17.06%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 36.24%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 18.82%
• 10Y*: 31.25%

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BOOT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOT

BOOT Risk / Return Rank: 67
BOOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BOOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BOOT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BOOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BOOT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOOT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	3.97	-3.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	3.91	-2.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.52	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	9.60	-8.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	27.88	-23.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOOT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOT and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOOT	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	3.97	-3.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	1.06	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.97	-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between BOOT and VRT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BOOT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOOT	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.73%	-71.24%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.71%	-24.78%	-7.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.62%	-71.24%	+10.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.63%	-9.26%	-20.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.48%	-16.47%	-16.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.05%	8.53%	+1.52%

Volatility

BOOT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is 12.00%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that BOOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOOT	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	20.14%	-8.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.98%	45.36%	-15.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.59%	62.91%	-12.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.75%	61.08%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.78%	54.59%	+3.19%

Financials