PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BOOT vs. VRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BOOTVRT
YTD Return79.26%66.50%
1Y Return51.63%105.74%
3Y Return (Ann)16.14%41.17%
5Y Return (Ann)32.15%51.03%
Sharpe Ratio1.162.03
Daily Std Dev42.63%52.42%
Max Drawdown-83.73%-71.24%
Current Drawdown-3.36%-24.70%

Fundamentals


BOOTVRT
Market Cap$4.20B$30.21B
EPS$4.93$1.27
PE Ratio27.9162.93
PEG Ratio1.721.24
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.71B$7.20B
Gross Profit (TTM)$629.20M$2.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$206.03M$960.10M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BOOT and VRT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BOOT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BOOT achieves a 79.26% return, which is significantly higher than VRT's 66.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
49.32%
13.32%
BOOT
VRT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.

Vertiv Holdings Co.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOOT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOOT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BOOT, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.004.04
VRT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VRT, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VRT, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VRT, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VRT, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VRT, currently valued at 9.13, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.009.13

BOOT vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BOOT and VRT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
1.16
2.03
BOOT
VRT

Dividends

BOOT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

BOOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


TTM2023202220212020
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.09%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Drawdowns

BOOT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOT drawdown since its inception was -83.73%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOT and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
-3.36%
-24.70%
BOOT
VRT

Volatility

BOOT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 15.83%. This indicates that BOOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
18.35%
15.83%
BOOT
VRT

Financials

BOOT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items