XIACY vs. LI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Li Auto Inc. (LI).

Performance

XIACY vs. LI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XIACY vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation	-18.78%	15.23%	118.16%	45.75%	-42.42%	-33.33%
LI Li Auto Inc.	8.56%	-29.43%	-35.91%	83.48%	-36.45%	3.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap XIACY : $106.86B LI : $19.15B
EPS XIACY : $7.80 LI : $1.08
PE Ratio XIACY : 2.62 LI : 16.95
PS Ratio XIACY : 0.24 LI : 0.17
PB Ratio XIACY : 0.40 LI : 0.26
Total Revenue (TTM) XIACY : $455.08B LI : $112.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) XIACY : $101.33B LI : $20.95B
EBITDA (TTM) XIACY : $47.43B LI : $935.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -18.78% return, which is significantly lower than LI's 8.56% return.

XIACY

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -18.78%
• 6M: -41.63%
• 1Y: -31.34%
• 3Y*: 38.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LI

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: -27.92%
• 1Y: -28.32%
• 3Y*: -9.69%
• 5Y*: -6.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XIACY vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIACY

XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 14
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

LI

LI Risk / Return Rank: 18
LI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LI Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
LI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIACY vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XIACY	LI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	-0.69	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	-0.84	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.91	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	-0.54	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-0.86	-0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIACY vs. LI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIACY Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the LI Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIACY and LI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XIACY	LI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.67	-0.69	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.03	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XIACY and LI is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XIACY vs. LI - Dividend Comparison

Neither XIACY nor LI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XIACY vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -70.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LI drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and LI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XIACY	LI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.71%	-69.02%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.29%	-50.53%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.18%	-60.60%	+12.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.43%	-39.14%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.81%	31.41%	-4.60%

Volatility

XIACY vs. LI - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to Li Auto Inc. (LI) at 12.46%. This indicates that XIACY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XIACY	LI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	12.46%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.32%	24.58%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.23%	41.37%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.86%	64.24%	-17.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.86%	68.96%	-22.10%

Financials

XIACY vs. LI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xiaomi Corporation and Li Auto Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 24.03B and revenue of 115.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

LI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.06B and revenue of 28.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 3.15B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

LI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported an operating income of -525.67M and revenue of 28.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.9%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 6.45B and revenue of 115.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

LI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Li Auto Inc. reported a net income of 6.43M and revenue of 28.38B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.