PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIACY vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XIACY vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -37.55% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 9.82% return.


XIACY

1D
-1.19%
1M
-19.70%
YTD
-37.55%
6M
-39.29%
1Y
-53.60%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
-2.98%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
9.82%
6M
9.69%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
29.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIACY vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
-37.55%15.23%118.16%45.75%-42.42%-35.46%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.82%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%36.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XIACY and AAPL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XIACY:

$83.22B

AAPL:

$4.40T

EPS

XIACY:

CN¥6.64

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

XIACY:

16.01

AAPL:

36.18

PEG Ratio

XIACY:

0.11

AAPL:

4.76

PS Ratio

XIACY:

1.28

AAPL:

9.82

PB Ratio

XIACY:

2.12

AAPL:

41.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

XIACY:

CN¥442.33B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XIACY:

CN¥97.61B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

XIACY:

CN¥40.74B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIACY vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIACY
XIACY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XIACY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIACY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIACY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XIACY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIACY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIACY vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIACYAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.42

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

3.80

-4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

9.39

-10.88

XIACY vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIACY Sharpe Ratio is -1.38, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIACY and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIACY vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIACYAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-81.80%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.16%

-13.80%

-46.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.16%

-33.36%

-26.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.71%

-33.36%

-37.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.16%

-5.45%

-54.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-29.59%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.86%

5.58%

+30.28%

Volatility

XIACY vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 7.10%. This indicates that XIACY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIACYAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

7.10%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.01%

16.62%

+10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.85%

22.64%

+16.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.46%

27.52%

+18.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.45%

28.92%

+17.53%

Dividends

XIACY vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
XIACY
Xiaomi Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

XIACY vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xiaomi Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B20222023202420252026
98.54B
111.18B
(XIACY) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. XIACY values in CNY, AAPL values in USD

XIACY vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xiaomi Corporation and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
22.0%
49.3%
Portfolio components
XIACY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.68B and revenue of 98.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

XIACY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

XIACY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Xiaomi Corporation reported a net income of 4.69B and revenue of 98.54B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XIACY and AAPL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XIACY has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to AAPL (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIACY dropped -71.03% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIACY and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer